Contribution of comorbidities to functional impairment is higher in heart failure with preserved than with reduced ejection fraction

2011 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Contribution of comorbidities to functional impairment is higher in heart failure with preserved than with reduced ejection fraction​
Edelmann, F. ; Stahrenberg, R.; Gelbrich, G.; Durstewitz, K.; Angermann, C.; Duengen, H.-D. & Scheffold, T. et al.​ (2011) 
Clinical Research in Cardiology100(9) pp. 755​-764​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-011-0305-4 

Documents & Media

392_2011_Article_305.pdf360.81 kBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Special user license Goescholar License

Details

Authors
Edelmann, Frank ; Stahrenberg, Raoul; Gelbrich, Götz; Durstewitz, Kathleen; Angermann, Christiane; Duengen, Hans-Dirk; Scheffold, Thomas; Zugck, Christian; Maisch, Bernhard; Regitz-Zagrosek, Vera; Hasenfuß, Gerd ; Pieske, Burkert M. ; Wachter, Rolf 
Abstract
Comorbidities negatively affect prognosis more strongly in heart failure with preserved (HFpEF) than with reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction. Their comparative impact on physical impairment in HFpEF and HFrEF has not been evaluated so far. The frequency of 12 comorbidities and their impact on NYHA class and SF-36 physical functioning score (SF-36 PF) were evaluated in 1,294 patients with HFpEF and 2,785 with HFrEF. HFpEF patients had lower NYHA class (2.0 +/- A 0.6 vs. 2.4 +/- A 0.6, p < 0.001) and higher SF-36 PF score (54.4 +/- A 28.3 vs. 54.4 +/- A 27.7, p < 0.001). All comorbidities were significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent in HFrEF, except hypertension and obesity, which were more frequent in HFpEF (p < 0.001). Adjusting for age and gender, COPD, anemia, hyperuricemia, atrial fibrillation, renal dysfunction, cerebrovascular disease and diabetes had a similar (p for interaction > 0.05) negative effect in both groups. Obesity, coronary artery disease and peripheral arterial occlusive disease exerted a significantly (p < 0.05) more adverse effect in HFpEF, while hypertension and hyperlipidemia were associated with fewer (p < 0.05) symptoms in HFrEF only. The total impact of comorbidities on NYHA (AUC for prediction of NYHA III/IV vs. I/II) and SF-36 PF (r (2)) in multivariate analyses was approximately 1.5-fold higher in HFpEF, and also much stronger than the impact of a 10% decrease in ejection fraction in HFrEF or a 5 mm decrease in left ventricular end-diastolic diameter in HFpEF. The impact of comorbidities on physical impairment is higher in HFpEF than in HFrEF. This should be considered in the differential diagnosis and in the treatment of patients with HFpEF.
Issue Date
2011
Journal
Clinical Research in Cardiology 
ISSN
1861-0684

Reference

Citations


Social Media