Mid- to long-term outcome of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Data of the BVS registry Göttingen predominantly from ACS patients

2017 | journal article

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Mid- to long-term outcome of patients treated with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Data of the BVS registry Göttingen predominantly from ACS patients​
Hellenkamp, K. ; Becker, A. ; Gabriel, Y. D. ; Hasenfuss, G. ; Hünlich, M. ; Jacobshagen, C.   & Schillinger, W.  et al.​ (2017) 
International Journal of Cardiology234 pp. 58​-63​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.02.069 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Hellenkamp, Kristian ; Becker, Alexander ; Gabriel, Yannick D. ; Hasenfuss, Gerd ; Hünlich, Mark ; Jacobshagen, Claudius ; Schillinger, Wolfgang ; Schroeter, Marco R. 
Abstract
Background Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) are widely used in routine clinical practice. While previous studies reported acceptable short- to midterm outcome after BVS implantation, data on longer-term outcome are rare. Methods Patients treated with at least one Absorb®-BVS were consecutively enrolled. Follow-up data were assessed after 834.0 [769.0–1026.0] days. The primary device-oriented composite endpoint (DOCE) was defined as cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction (MI) and/or target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results Between 2012 and 2014, 195 patients were included into study analysis. Overall, 244 BVS were implanted. Mean patient age was 64.0[54.3–74.0] years. Three-quarter of patients had an ACS; of those 42.9% had ST-elevation-MI and 40.8% had non-ST-elevation-MI. DOCE occurred in 3.1%, 6.7%, 11.8% and 15.4% of patients during hospital stay, within 6-months, 18-months or during the complete follow-up period, respectively. In those patients, median time until DOCE was 211.5[43.25–567.25] days. In 11 (36.7%) patients DOCE occurred after > 12 months. Using univariable analysis, bifurcation stenting was associated with a hazard ratio (HR) of 11.8[2.38–58.57] for TLR (p = 0.002) and 2.1[1.02–4.49] for DOCE (p = 0.045). Similarly, in ACS patients, bifurcation stenting was associated with an increased risk for TLR (HR = 10.4[2.01–53.56]; p = 0.005) and for DOCE (HR = 2.4[1.09–5.32]; p = 0.029) and in multivariable analysis, it remained an independent predictor of DOCE (HR = 3.0; p = 0.018). Conclusions Although, the rates of (potentially) device-related complications following BVS implantation are acceptable, they are nonetheless not negligible. Interestingly, they did not decline over time. Bifurcation stenting could be found as relevant procedure-related predictor of DOCE, especially in ACS patients. Randomized trials are warranted to confirm these findings.
Issue Date
2017
Journal
International Journal of Cardiology 
ISSN
0167-5273
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media