Effects of Manipulated Above- and Belowground Organic Matter Input on Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation

2015 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Effects of Manipulated Above- and Belowground Organic Matter Input on Soil Respiration in a Chinese Pine Plantation​
Fan, J.; Wang, J.; Zhao, B. O.; Wu, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, X. & Gadow, K. V.​ (2015) 
PLoS ONE10(5) art. e0126337​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0126337 

Documents & Media

journal.pone.0126337.pdf1.39 MBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Fan, Juan; Wang, J.; Zhao, B. O.; Wu, L.; Zhang, C.; Zhao, X.; Gadow, Klaus V.
Abstract
Alteration in the amount of soil organic matter input can have profound effect on carbon dynamics in forest soils. The objective of our research was to determine the response in soil respiration to above- and belowground organic matter manipulation in a Chinese pine (Pinus tabulaeformis) plantation. Five organic matter treatments were applied during a 2-year experiment: both litter removal and root trenching (LRRT), only litter removal (LR), control (CK), only root trenching (RT) and litter addition (LA). We found that either aboveground litter removal or root trenching decreased soil respiration. On average, soil respiration rate was significantly decreased in the LRRT treatment, by about 38.93% +/- 2.01% compared to the control. Soil respiration rate in the LR treatment was 30.65% +/- 1.87% and in the RT treatment 17.65% +/- 1.95% lower than in the control. Litter addition significantly increased soil respiration rate by about 25.82% +/- 2.44% compared to the control. Soil temperature and soil moisture were the main factors affecting seasonal variation in soil respiration. Up to the 59.7% to 82.9% seasonal variation in soil respiration is explained by integrating soil temperature and soil moisture within each of the various organic matter treatments. The temperature sensitivity parameter, Q(10), was higher in the RT (2.72) and LA (3.19) treatments relative to the control (2.51), but lower in the LRRT (1.52) and LR treatments (1.36). Our data suggest that manipulation of soil organic matter input can not only alter soil CO2 efflux, but also have profound effect on the temperature sensitivity of organic carbon decomposition in a temperate pine forest.
Issue Date
2015
Status
published
Publisher
Public Library Science
Journal
PLoS ONE 
ISSN
1932-6203

Reference

Citations


Social Media