Impact of Baroreflex Activation Therapy on Renal Function - A Pilot Study

2014 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Impact of Baroreflex Activation Therapy on Renal Function - A Pilot Study​
Wallbach, M. ; Lehnig, L.-Y.; Schroer, C.; Hasenfuß, G. ; Mueller, G.-A. ; Wachter, R.   & Koziolek, M. J. ​ (2014) 
American Journal of Nephrology40(4) pp. 371​-380​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000368723 

Documents & Media

AJN368723.pdf723.3 kBUnknown

License

Details

Authors
Wallbach, Manuel ; Lehnig, Luca-Yves; Schroer, Charlotte; Hasenfuß, Gerd ; Mueller, Gerhard-Anton ; Wachter, Rolf ; Koziolek, Michael J. 
Abstract
Background/Aims: Resistant hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are interlinked via sympathetic overdrive. Baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) has been shown to chronically reduce blood pressure (BP) in patients with resistant hypertension. The effect of BAT on renal function in CKD patients with resistant hypertension has not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of sympathetic inhibition on renal function in CKD patients. Methods: 23 CKD patients with resistant hypertension were prospectively treated with BAT. Analyses were performed before and 6 months after the start of BAT. The renal function was analyzed by creatinine, cystatin C, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), renin, aldosterone, fractioned and 24-hour sodium excretion and analyses of urine marker proteins. The purpose of the control group was to investigate the influence of treating patients in a center for hypertension and regression to the mean on investigated variables. Results:The office mean BP decreased from 116.9 +/- 20.9 mm Hg to 104.2 +/- 22.2 mm Hg (p < 0.01), while the number of prescribed antihypertensive classes decreased from 6.6 +/- 1.6 to 6.1 +/- 1.7 (p = 0.02). Proteinuria and albuminuria decreased from a median of 283.9 and 47.7 to 136.5 (p = 0.01) and 45.0 mg/g creatinine (p = 0.01) with pronounced effects in higher CKD stage III + IV compared to I + II (p < 0.01). CKD-EPI cystatin C equation improved from 53.6 +/- 22.7 to 60.4 +/- 26.1 ml/min (p = 0.02). While creatinine and GFR were impaired after a period of 6 months, no changes of proteinuria, albuminuria, or BP were obtained in control patients. Conclusion: The data of this prospective trial demonstrate potential nephroprotective effects of BAT in therapy-resistant hypertension in CKD patients by a reduction of BP, proteinuria and moreover, a stabilization of estimated GFR. (C) 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
Issue Date
2014
Publisher
S. Karger AG
Journal
American Journal of Nephrology 
ISSN
0250-8095
eISSN
1421-9670
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media