EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis

2015 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​EMG Biofeedback for online predictive control of grasping force in a myoelectric prosthesis​
Dosen, S.; Markovic, M.; Somer, K.; Graimann, B. & Farina, D.​ (2015) 
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation12(1) art. 55​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-015-0047-z 

Documents & Media

12984_2015_Article_47.pdf2.01 MBAdobe PDF

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Dosen, Strahinja; Markovic, Marko; Somer, Kelef; Graimann, Bernhard; Farina, Dario
Abstract
Background Active hand prostheses controlled using electromyography (EMG) signals have been used for decades to restore the grasping function, lost after an amputation. Although myocontrol is a simple and intuitive interface, it is also imprecise due to the stochastic nature of the EMG recorded using surface electrodes. Furthermore, the sensory feedback from the prosthesis to the user is still missing. In this study, we present a novel concept to close the loop in myoelectric prostheses. In addition to conveying the grasping force (system output), we provided to the user the online information about the system input (EMG biofeedback). Methods As a proof-of-concept, the EMG biofeedback was transmitted in the current study using a visual interface (ideal condition). Ten able-bodied subjects and two amputees controlled a state-of-the-art myoelectric prosthesis in routine grasping and force steering tasks using EMG and force feedback (novel approach) and force feedback only (classic approach). The outcome measures were the variability of the generated forces and absolute deviation from the target levels in the routine grasping task, and the root mean square tracking error and the number of sudden drops in the force steering task. Results During the routine grasping, the novel method when used by able-bodied subjects decreased twofold the force dispersion as well as absolute deviations from the target force levels, and also resulted in a more accurate and stable tracking of the reference force profiles during the force steering. Furthermore, the force variability during routine grasping did not increase for the higher target forces with EMG biofeedback. The trend was similar in the two amputees. Conclusions The study demonstrated that the subjects, including the two experienced users of a myoelectric prosthesis, were able to exploit the online EMG biofeedback to observe and modulate the myoelectric signals, generating thereby more consistent commands. This allowed them to control the force predictively (routine grasping) and with a finer resolution (force steering). The future step will be to implement this promising and simple approach using an electrotactile interface. A prosthesis with a reliable response, following faithfully user intentions, would improve the utility during daily-life use and also facilitate the embodiment of the assistive system.
Issue Date
2015
Journal
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 
Project
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/286208/EU//MYOSENS
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media