What research agenda could be generated from the European General Practice Research Network concept of Multimorbidity in Family Practice?

2015 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​What research agenda could be generated from the European General Practice Research Network concept of Multimorbidity in Family Practice?​
Le Reste, J. Y.; Nabbe, P.; Lingner, H.; Kasuba Lazic, D.; Assenova, R.; Munoz, M. & Sowinska, A. et al.​ (2015) 
BMC Family Practice16(1) art. 125​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-015-0337-3 

Documents & Media

2015_Doerr_research.pdf400.33 kBAdobe PDF12875_2015_Article_337.pdf400.89 kBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Le Reste, J. Y.; Nabbe, P.; Lingner, H.; Kasuba Lazic, D.; Assenova, R.; Munoz, M.; Sowinska, A.; Lygidakis, C.; Doerr, C.; Czachowski, S.; Argyriadou, S.; Valderas, J.; Le Floch, B.; Deriennic, J.; Jan, T.; Melot, E.; Barraine, P.; Odorico, M.; Lietard, C.; Van Royen, P.; Van Marwijk, H.
Abstract
Abstract Background Multimorbidity is an intuitively appealing, yet challenging, concept for Family Medicine (FM). An EGPRN working group has published a comprehensive definition of the concept based on a systematic review of the literature which is closely linked to patient complexity and to the biopsychosocial model. This concept was identified by European Family Physicians (FPs) throughout Europe using 13 qualitative surveys. To further our understanding of the issues around multimorbidity, we needed to do innovative research to clarify this concept. The research question for this survey was: what research agenda could be generated for Family Medicine from the EGPRN concept of Multimorbidity? Methods Nominal group design with a purposive panel of experts in the field of multimorbidity. The nominal group worked through four phases: ideas generation phase, ideas recording phase, evaluation and analysis phase and a prioritization phase. Results Fifteen international experts participated. A research agenda was established, featuring 6 topics and 11 themes with their corresponding study designs. The highest priorities were given to the following topics: measuring multimorbidity and the impact of multimorbidity. In addition the experts stressed that the concept should be simplified. This would be best achieved by working in reverse: starting with the outcomes and working back to find the useful variables within the concept. Conclusion The highest priority for future research on multimorbidity should be given to measuring multimorbidity and to simplifying the EGPRN model, using a pragmatic approach to determine the useful variables within the concept from its outcomes.
Issue Date
2015
Journal
BMC Family Practice 
Organization
Institut für Allgemeinmedizin 
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media