American and German attitudes towards cow-calf separation on dairy farms

2017 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​American and German attitudes towards cow-calf separation on dairy farms​
Busch, G.; Weary, D. M.; Spiller, A.   & von Keyserlingk, M. A. G.​ (2017) 
PLoS One12(3) art. e0174013​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174013 

Documents & Media

journal.pone.0174013.pdf557.99 kBAdobe PDF

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Busch, Gesa; Weary, Daniel M.; Spiller, Achim ; von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G.
Abstract
Public concerns regarding the quality of life of farm animals are often focused on specific practices such as separating the cow and calf immediately after birth. The available scientific literature provides some evidence in support of this practice (including reduced acute responses to separation when it does occur), as well as evidence of disadvantages (such as increased risk of uterine disease in cows). The aim of this study is to systematically examine public views around this practice. Specifically, this study analyzes the views of American and German citizens to separation of cow and calf at birth using a quantitative segmentation approach. Although the majority of participants opposed early separation, a small proportion of our sample supported the practice. According to participants' preference for early and later separation and their evaluation of different arguments for both practices, three clusters were identified. US participants were more likely to support early separation compared to German participants. The arguments presented for and against both practices caused different reactions in the three clusters, but did not appear to sway the opinions of most participants. The results show considerable opposition to the practice of early separation in large parts of the sample and suggest that the dairy industry should consider approaches to address this concern.
Issue Date
2017
Journal
PLoS One 
Working Group
RTG 2654: Sustainable Food Systems (Related Publications) 
ISSN
1932-6203
Language
English
Sponsor
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2017

Reference

Citations


Social Media