Does picture background matter? People's evaluation of pigs in different farm settings.

2019 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Does picture background matter? People's evaluation of pigs in different farm settings.​
Busch, G.; Gauly, S.; von Meyer-Höfer, M. & Spiller, A. ​ (2019) 
PLoS One14(2) art. e0211256​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211256 

Documents & Media

journal.pone.0211256.pdf1.88 MBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Busch, Gesa; Gauly, Sarah; von Meyer-Höfer, Marie; Spiller, Achim 
Abstract
Pictures of farm animals and their husbandry systems are frequently presented in the media and are mostly connected to discussions surrounding farm animal welfare. How such pictures are perceived by the broader public is not fully understood thus far. It is presumable that the animals' expressions and body languages as well as their depicted environment or husbandry systems affect public perception. Therefore, the aim of this study is to test how the evaluation of a picture showing a farmed pig is influenced by portrayed attributes, as well as participants' perceptions of pigs' abilities in general, and if connection to agriculture has an influence. In an online survey, 1,019 German residents were shown four modified pictures of a pig in a pen. The pictures varied with regards to facial expression and body language of the pig ('happy' versus 'unhappy' pig) and the barn setting (straw versus slatted floor pen). Respondents were asked to evaluate both the pen and the welfare of the pig. Two Linear Mixed Models were calculated to analyze effects on pig and pen evaluation. For the pictures, the pen had the largest influence on both pig and pen evaluation, followed by the pig's appearance and participants' beliefs in pigs' mental and emotional abilities, as well as their connection to agriculture. The welfare of both the 'happy' and the 'unhappy' pig was assessed to be higher in the straw setting compared to the slatted floor setting in our study, and even the 'unhappy pig' on straw was perceived more positively than the 'happy pig' on slatted floor. The straw pen was evaluated as being better than the slatted floor pen on the pictures we presented but the pens also differed in level of dirt on the walls (more dirt in the slatted floor pen), which might have influenced the results. Nevertheless, the results suggest that enduring aspects of pictures such as the husbandry system influence perceptions more than a momentary body expression of the pig, at least in the settings tested herein.
Issue Date
2019
Journal
PLoS One 
Working Group
RTG 2654: Sustainable Food Systems (Related Publications) 
ISSN
1932-6203
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media