Free-energy perturbation and quantum mechanical study of SAMPL4 octa-acid host-guest binding energies
2014 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.
Jump to:Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history
Cite this publication
Free-energy perturbation and quantum mechanical study of SAMPL4 octa-acid host-guest binding energies
Mikulskis, P.; Cioloboc, D.; Andrejic, M.; Khare, S.; Brorsson, J.; Genheden, S. & Mata, R. A. et al. (2014)
Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 28(4) pp. 375-400. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10822-014-9739-x
Documents & Media
Details
- Authors
- Mikulskis, Paulius; Cioloboc, Daniela; Andrejic, Milica; Khare, Sakshi; Brorsson, Joakim; Genheden, Samuel; Mata, Ricardo A. ; Soderhjelm, Par; Ryde, Ulf
- Abstract
- We have estimated free energies for the binding of nine cyclic carboxylate guest molecules to the octa-acid host in the SAMPL4 blind-test challenge with four different approaches. First, we used standard free-energy perturbation calculations of relative binding affinities, performed at the molecular-mechanics (MM) level with TIP3P waters, the GAFF force field, and two different sets of charges for the host and the guest, obtained either with the restrained electrostatic potential or AM1-BCC methods. Both charge sets give good and nearly identical results, with a mean absolute deviation (MAD) of 4 kJ/mol and a correlation coefficient (R-2) of 0.8 compared to experimental results. Second, we tried to improve these predictions with 28,800 density-functional theory (DFT) calculations for selected snapshots and the non-Boltzmann Bennett acceptance-ratio method, but this led to much worse results, probably because of a too large difference between the MM and DFT potential-energy functions. Third, we tried to calculate absolute affinities using minimised DFT structures. This gave intermediate-quality results with MADs of 5-9 kJ/mol and R-2 = 0.6-0.8, depending on how the structures were obtained. Finally, we tried to improve these results using local coupled-cluster calculations with single and double excitations, and non-iterative perturbative treatment of triple excitations (LCCSD(T0)), employing the polarisable multipole interactions with supermolecular pairs approach. Unfortunately, this only degraded the predictions, probably because of a mismatch between the solvation energies obtained at the DFT and LCCSD(T0) levels.
- Issue Date
- 2014
- Journal
- Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design
- ISSN
- 1573-4951
- eISSN
- 0920-654X
- Language
- English