Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Affects the BOLD Signal in a Frequency and Task-dependent Manner

2016 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Affects the BOLD Signal in a Frequency and Task-dependent Manner​
Cabral-Calderin, Y. ; Weinrich, C. A. ; Schmidt-Samoa, C. ; Poland, E.; Dechent, P. ; Bähr, M.   & Wilke, M. ​ (2016) 
Human Brain Mapping37(1) pp. 94​-121​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23016 

Documents & Media

hbm23016.pdf1.1 MBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 CC BY-NC-ND 4.0

Details

Authors
Cabral-Calderin, Yuranny ; Weinrich, Christiane Anne ; Schmidt-Samoa, Carsten ; Poland, Eva; Dechent, Peter ; Bähr, Mathias ; Wilke, Melanie 
Abstract
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) has emerged as a promising tool for manipulating ongoing brain oscillations. While previous studies demonstrated frequency-specific effects of tACS on diverse cognitive functions, its effect on neural activity remains poorly understood. Here we asked how tACS modulates regional fMRI blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal as a function of frequency, current strength, and task condition. TACS was applied over the posterior cortex of healthy human subjects while the BOLD signal was measured during rest or task conditions (visual perception, passive video viewing and motor task). TACS was applied in a blockwise manner at different frequencies (10, 16, 60 and 80 Hz). The strongest tACS effects on BOLD activity were observed with stimulation at alpha (10 Hz) and beta (16 Hz) frequency bands, while effects of tACS at the gamma range were rather modest. Specifically, we found that tACS at 16 Hz induced BOLD activity increase in fronto-parietal areas. Overall, tACS effects varied as a function of frequency and task, and were predominantly seen in regions that were not activated by the task. Also, the modulated regions were poorly predicted by current density modeling studies. Taken together, our results suggest that tACS does not necessarily exert its strongest effects in regions below the electrodes and that region specificity might be achieved with tACS due to varying susceptibility of brain regions to entrain to a given frequency. (C) 2015 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Issue Date
2016
Journal
Human Brain Mapping 
ISSN
1065-9471
eISSN
1097-0193
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media