Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 7: assessing the assumptions

2017 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to:Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Quasi-experimental study designs series—paper 7: assessing the assumptions​
Bärnighausen, T.; Oldenburg, C.; Tugwell, P.; Bommer, C. ; Ebert, C.; Barreto, M. & Djimeu, E. et al.​ (2017) 
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology89 pp. 53​-66​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.02.017 

Documents & Media

License

Author's Version

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Bärnighausen, Till; Oldenburg, Catherine; Tugwell, Peter; Bommer, Christian ; Ebert, Cara; Barreto, Mauricio; Djimeu, Eric; Haber, Noah; Waddington, Hugh; Rockers, Peter; Sianesi, Barbara; Bor, Jacob; Fink, Günther; Valentine, Jeffrey; Tanner, Jeffrey; Stanley, Tom; Sierra, Eduardo; Tchetgen, Eric Tchetgen; Atun, Rifat; Vollmer, Sebastian 
Abstract
Quasi-experimental designs are gaining popularity in epidemiology and health systems research—in particular for the evaluation of health care practice, programs, and policy—because they allow strong causal inferences without randomized controlled experiments. We describe the concepts underlying five important quasi-experimental designs: Instrumental Variables, Regression Discontinuity, Interrupted Time Series, Fixed Effects, and Difference-in-Differences designs. We illustrate each of the designs with an example from health research. We then describe the assumptions required for each of the designs to ensure valid causal inference and discuss the tests available to examine the assumptions.
Issue Date
2017
Journal
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 
Organization
Department für Volkswirtschaftslehre (VWL) 
ISSN
0895-4356
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media