Risk assessment for airborne disease transmission by poly-pathogen aerosols

2021 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Risk assessment for airborne disease transmission by poly-pathogen aerosols​
Nordsiek, F.; Bodenschatz, E.   & Bagheri, G.​ (2021) 
PLoS One16(4) pp. e0248004​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248004 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Nordsiek, Freja; Bodenschatz, Eberhard ; Bagheri, Gholamhossein
Editors
Kryven, Ivan
Abstract
In the case of airborne diseases, pathogen copies are transmitted by droplets of respiratory tract fluid that are exhaled by the infectious that stay suspended in the air for some time and, after partial or full drying, inhaled as aerosols by the susceptible. The risk of infection in indoor environments is typically modelled using the Wells-Riley model or a Wells-Riley-like formulation, usually assuming the pathogen dose follows a Poisson distribution (mono-pathogen assumption). Aerosols that hold more than one pathogen copy, i.e. poly-pathogen aerosols, break this assumption even if the aerosol dose itself follows a Poisson distribution. For the largest aerosols where the number of pathogen in each aerosol can sometimes be several hundred or several thousand, the effect is non-negligible, especially in diseases where the risk of infection per pathogen is high. Here we report on a generalization of the Wells-Riley model and dose-response models for poly-pathogen aerosols by separately modeling each number of pathogen copies per aerosol, while the aerosol dose itself follows a Poisson distribution. This results in a model for computational risk assessment suitable for mono-/poly-pathogen aerosols. We show that the mono-pathogen assumption significantly overestimates the risk of infection for high pathogen concentrations in the respiratory tract fluid. The model also includes the aerosol removal due to filtering by the individuals which becomes significant for poorly ventilated environments with a high density of individuals, and systematically includes the effects of facemasks in the infectious aerosol source and sink terms and dose calculations.
Issue Date
2021
Journal
PLoS One 
eISSN
1932-6203
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media