Predicting OH stretching fundamental wavenumbers of alcohols for conformational assignment: different correction patterns for density functional and wave-function-based methods

2021 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Predicting OH stretching fundamental wavenumbers of alcohols for conformational assignment: different correction patterns for density functional and wave-function-based methods​
Medel, R. & Suhm, M. A. ​ (2021) 
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics23(9) pp. 5629​-5643​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1CP00342A 

Documents & Media

document.pdf3.67 MBAdobe PDF

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Medel, Robert; Suhm, Martin A. 
Abstract
Affordable predictions for absolute OH stretching fundamental wavenumbers of alcohols with conformational accuracy are possible when the different deficiencies of quantum chemical methods are empirically corrected.
A model is presented for the prediction of OH stretching fundamental wavenumbers of alcohol conformers in the gas phase by application of a small set of empirical anharmonicity corrections to calculations in the harmonic approximation. In contrast to the popular application of a uniform scaling factor, the local chemical structure of the alcohol is taken into account to greatly improve accuracy. Interestingly, different correction patterns emerge for results of hybrid density functional (B3LYP-D3 and PBE0-D3) and wave-function-based methods (SCS-LMP2, LCCSD(T )-F12a and CCSD(T)-F12a 1D). This raises questions about electronic structure deficiencies in these methods and differences in anharmonicity between alcohols. After its initial construction on the basis of literature assignments the model is tested with Raman jet spectroscopy of propargyl alcohol, cyclohexanol, borneol, isopinocampheol and 2-methylbutan-2-ol. For propargyl alcohol a spectral splitting attributed to tunneling is resolved. PBE0-D3 is identified as a well performing and broadly affordable electronic structure method for this model. A mean absolute error of 1.3 cm −1 and a maximum absolute error of 3 cm −1 result for 46 conformers of 24 alcohols in a 60 cm −1 range, when a single parameter is adjusted separately for each alcohol substitution class (methanol, primary, secondary, tertiary).
Issue Date
2021
Journal
Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics 
ISSN
1463-9076
eISSN
1463-9084
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media