The price penalty for red meat substitutes in popular dishes and the diversity in substitution

2021 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​The price penalty for red meat substitutes in popular dishes and the diversity in substitution​
Lemken, D. ​ (2021) 
PLoS One16(6) pp. e0252675​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0252675 

Documents & Media

Main article694.52 kBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Lemken, Dominic 
Abstract
Life cycle assessments (LCA) often highlight the environmental and health benefits for consumers if western diets substitute red meat. However, the specific trade-off consumer face when asked to substitute a red meat dish is scarcely researched, often neglecting the bouquet of substitution options and/or the price component involved. Four substitution strategies are evaluated within an individually adapted choice based conjoint: the substitution by (1) the same red meat dishes with a halved meat portion size, (2) novel plant-based products that mimic the functionality and taste, (3) authentic plant-based components that just mimic the functionality, and (4) vegetarian dishes that just neglect the meat component if still familiar to consumers. The analysis is executed for three popular red meat dishes to account for consistency across meal scenarios, namely Meatballs, Spaghetti Bolognese and Sausage Buns. The analysis is sensitive to red meat consumption habits to better understand the preferences of consumers that can actually substitute a red meat intake.
Issue Date
2021
Journal
PLoS One 
Organization
Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung 
eISSN
1932-6203
Language
English
Sponsor
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021

Reference

Citations


Social Media