Promises and pitfalls of digital credit: Empirical evidence from Kenya

2021 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Promises and pitfalls of digital credit: Empirical evidence from Kenya​
Johnen, C.; Parlasca, M. & Mußhoff, O. ​ (2021) 
PLoS One16(7) pp. e0255215​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255215 

Documents & Media

Main article738.66 kBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Johnen, Constantin; Parlasca, Martin; Mußhoff, Oliver 
Abstract
Digital credit is a recent innovation that raises hopes of improving credit access in developing countries. However, up until now, empirical research on the extent to which digital credit actually reaches people who are otherwise excluded from conventional credit markets and whether increased credit access is sustainable or threatened by high default and blacklisting rates is very scarce. Using representative data from Kenya, this article shows that digital credit increases borrowing opportunities, including for people less likely to otherwise have credit access in the conventional credit markets. However, we find that digital credit borrowing is also responsible for 90% of all blacklistings, which is partially driven by higher default rates in the digital credit market but also by a higher probability that digital credit defaults lead to blacklisting of the borrower, compared to defaults in other credit markets.
Issue Date
2021
Journal
PLoS One 
Organization
Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung 
eISSN
1932-6203
Language
English
Sponsor
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2021

Reference

Citations


Social Media