Chimpanzees consider freedom of choice in their evaluation of social action

2022 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to:Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Chimpanzees consider freedom of choice in their evaluation of social action​
Engelmann, J. M.; Herrmann, E.; Proft, M.; Keupp, S.; Dunham, Y. & Rakoczy, H.​ (2022) 
Biology Letters18(2).​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2021.0502 

Documents & Media

License

Usage license

Details

Authors
Engelmann, Jan M.; Herrmann, Esther; Proft, Marina; Keupp, Stefanie; Dunham, Yarrow; Rakoczy, Hannes
Abstract
Judgements of wrongdoing in humans often hinge upon an assessment of whether a perpetrator acted out of free choice: whether they had more than one option. The classic inhibitors of free choice are constraint (e.g. having your hands tied together) and ignorance (e.g. being unaware that an alternative exists). Here, across two studies, we investigate whether chimpanzees consider these factors in their evaluation of social action. Chimpanzees interacted with a human experimenter who handed them a non-preferred item of food, either because they were physically constrained from accessing the preferred item (Experiment 1) or because they were ignorant of the availability of the preferred item (Experiment 2). We found that chimpanzees were more likely to accept the non-preferred food and showed fewer negative emotional responses when the experimenter was physically constrained compared with when they had free choice. We did not, however, find an effect of ignorance on chimpanzee's evaluation. Freedom of choice factors into chimpanzees' evaluation of how they are treated, but it is unclear whether mental state reasoning is involved in this assessment.
Issue Date
2022
Journal
Biology Letters 
eISSN
1744-957X
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media