Determinants for receiving acupuncture for LBP and associated treatments: a prospective cohort study

2006 | journal article; research paper. A publication of Göttingen

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Determinants for receiving acupuncture for LBP and associated treatments: a prospective cohort study​
Chenot, J.-F.; Becker, A.; Leonhardt, C.; Keller, S.; Donner-Banzhoff, N.; Baum, E. & Pfingsten, M. et al.​ (2006) 
BMC Health Services Research6 art. 149​.​ DOI: 

Documents & Media

2006-chenot.pdf266.44 kBAdobe PDF


Published Version

Special user license Goescholar License


Chenot, Jean-Francois; Becker, Annette; Leonhardt, Corinna; Keller, Stefan; Donner-Banzhoff, Norbert; Baum, Erika; Pfingsten, Michael; Hildebrandt, Jan; Kochen, Michael M. ; Basler, Heinz-Dieter
Background: Acupuncture is a frequently used but controversial adjunct to the treatment of chronic low back pain (LBP). Acupuncture is now considered to be effective for chronic LBP and health care systems are pressured to make a decision whether or not acupuncture should be covered. It has been suggested that providing such services might reduce the use of other health care services. Therefore, we explored factors associated with acupuncture treatment for LBP and the relation of acupuncture with other health care services. Methods: This is a post hoc analysis of a longitudinal prospective cohort study. General practitioners (GPs) recruited consecutive adult patients with LBP. Data on physical function, subjective mood and utilization of health care services was collected at the first consultation and at follow-up telephone interviews for a period of twelve months. Results: A total of 179 (13%) out of 1,345 patients received acupuncture treatment. The majority of those (59%) had chronic LBP. Women and elderly patients were more likely to be given acupuncture. Additional determinants of acupuncture therapy were low functional capacity and chronicity of pain. Chronic ( vs. acute) back pain OR 1.6 ( CL 1.4-2.9) was the only significant disease-related factor associated with the treatment. The strongest predictors for receiving acupuncture were consultation with a GP who offers acupuncture OR 3.5 ( CL 2.9 - 4.1) and consultation with a specialist OR 2.1 ( CL 1.9 - 2.3). After adjustment for patient characteristics, acupuncture remained associated with higher consultation rates and an increased use of other health care services like physiotherapy. Conclusion: Receiving acupuncture for LBP depends mostly on the availability of the treatment. It is associated with increased use of other health services even after adjustment for patient characteristics. In our study, we found that receiving acupuncture does not offset the use of other health care resources. A significant proportion of patients who received did not meet the so far only known selection criterion (chonicity). Acupuncture therapy might be a reflection of helplessness in both patients and health care providers.
Issue Date
BMC Health Services Research 
Institut für Allgemeinmedizin 



Social Media