Context Specificity of Economic Research: The Example of Corruption Research in Southeast Asia
2016 | book part
Jump to:Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history
Cite this publication
Context Specificity of Economic Research: The Example of Corruption Research in Southeast Asia
Kis-Katos, K. & Schulze, G. G. (2016)
In:Huotari, Mikko; Rüland, Jürgen; Schlehe, Judith (Eds.), Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies pp. 187-209. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397546_10
Documents & Media
Details
- Authors
- Kis-Katos, Krisztina ; Schulze, Günther G.
- Editors
- Huotari, Mikko; Rüland, Jürgen; Schlehe, Judith
- Abstract
- Area studies have focused their epistemological interest on one particular geographical area, however defined, and have often approached their objects of interest from various disciplinary or even interdisciplinary angles. Economics has contributed to area studies for a long time by providing area-specific analyses that combined sound economic reasoning with in-depth knowledge of the region. Area studies find their common ground in the area they study, not primarily in the issues studied within these areas or in the methodological approach they take. As a consequence, there is no Southeast Asia-specific economic methodology—the analytical tools in economics, whether theoretical or empirical, are not restricted to a particular geographic (or cultural, political, economic, social) area; they are applicable to the object of study regardless where it is placed.
- Issue Date
- 2016
- Publisher
- Palgrave Macmillan UK
- ISBN
- 978-1-349-48500-0
- Language
- English