Context Specificity of Economic Research: The Example of Corruption Research in Southeast Asia

2016 | book part

Jump to:Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Context Specificity of Economic Research: The Example of Corruption Research in Southeast Asia​
Kis-Katos, K.  & Schulze, G. G.​ (2016)
In:​Huotari, Mikko; Rüland, Jürgen; Schlehe, Judith​ (Eds.), Methodology and Research Practice in Southeast Asian Studies pp. 187​-209. ​London: ​Palgrave Macmillan UK. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137397546_10 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Kis-Katos, Krisztina ; Schulze, Günther G.
Editors
Huotari, Mikko; Rüland, Jürgen; Schlehe, Judith
Abstract
Area studies have focused their epistemological interest on one particular geographical area, however defined, and have often approached their objects of interest from various disciplinary or even interdisciplinary angles. Economics has contributed to area studies for a long time by providing area-specific analyses that combined sound economic reasoning with in-depth knowledge of the region. Area studies find their common ground in the area they study, not primarily in the issues studied within these areas or in the methodological approach they take. As a consequence, there is no Southeast Asia-specific economic methodology—the analytical tools in economics, whether theoretical or empirical, are not restricted to a particular geographic (or cultural, political, economic, social) area; they are applicable to the object of study regardless where it is placed.
Issue Date
2016
Publisher
Palgrave Macmillan UK
ISBN
978-1-349-48500-0
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media