Contrasting diversity patterns of soil mites and nematodes in secondary succession

2009 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to:Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Contrasting diversity patterns of soil mites and nematodes in secondary succession​
Kardol, P.; Newton, J. S.; Bezemer, T. M.; Maraun, M. & van der Putten, W. H.​ (2009) 
Acta Oecologica35(5) pp. 603​-609​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actao.2009.05.006 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Kardol, Paul; Newton, Jeffrey S.; Bezemer, T. Martijn; Maraun, Mark; van der Putten, Wim H.
Abstract
Soil biodiversity has been recognized as a key feature of ecosystem functioning and stability. However, soil biodiversity is strongly impaired by agriculture and relatively little is known on how and at what spatial and temporal scales soil biodiversity is restored after the human disturbances have come to an end. Here, a multi-scale approach was used to compare diversity patterns of soil mites and nematodes at four stages (early, mid, late, reference site) along a secondary succession chronosequence from abandoned arable land to heath land. In each field four soil samples were taken during four successive seasons. We determined soil diversity within samples (alpha-diversity), between samples (beta-diversity) and within field sites (gamma-diversity). The patterns of alpha- and gamma-diversity developed similarly along the chronosequence for oribatid mites, but not for nematodes. Nematode alpha-diversity was highest in mid- and late-successional sites, while gamma-diversity was constant along the chronosequence. Oribatid mite beta-diversity was initially high, but decreased thereafter, whereas nematode beta-diversity increased when succession proceeded: indicating that patterns of within-site heterogeneity diverged for oribatid mites and nematodes. The spatio-temporal diversity patterns after land abandonment suggest that oribatid mite community development depends predominantly on colonization of new taxa, whereas nematode community development depends on shifts in dominance patterns. This would imply that at old fields diversity patterns of oribatid mites are mainly controlled by dispersal, whereas diversity patterns of nematodes are mainly controlled by changing abiotic or biotic soil conditions. Our Study shows that the restoration of soil biodiversity along secondary successional gradients can be both scale- and phylum-dependent. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.
Issue Date
2009
Status
published
Publisher
Gauthier-villars/editions Elsevier
Journal
Acta Oecologica 
ISSN
1146-609X

Reference

Citations


Social Media