Crop Rotational Effects on Yield Formation in Current Sugar Beet Production - Results From a Farm Survey and Field Trials

2018 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to:Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Crop Rotational Effects on Yield Formation in Current Sugar Beet Production - Results From a Farm Survey and Field Trials​
Koch, H.-J.; Trimpler, K.; Jacobs, A. & Stockfisch, N.​ (2018) 
Frontiers in plant science9 art. 231​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00231 

Documents & Media

fpls-09-00231.pdf1.88 MBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Koch, Heinz-Josef; Trimpler, Kerrin; Jacobs, Anna; Stockfisch, Nicol
Abstract
In Europe, the framework for sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) production was subject to considerable changes and for the future it is expected that sugar beet cultivation might concentrate around the sugar factories for economic reasons. Based on data from a national sugar beet farmers' survey and multi-year crop rotation trials, the effects of cropping interval (number of years in between two subsequent sugar beet crops) and of preceding crops on sugar yield were elucidated under current Central European management conditions. The dominating sugar beet cropping interval was ≥4 years in the farm survey with pronounced differences between regions. However, the cropping intervals 2, 3, and ≥4 years did not affect the sugar yield. Therefore, significant differences in sugar yield between regions were assumed to be caused by multiple interactions between year, site, and farmers' skills. Throughout Germany, the dominating preceding crops in sugar beet cultivation were winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and winter barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). In the field trials, the sugar yield was 5% higher after pea (Pisum sativum L.) compared to maize (Zea mays L.) as preceding crop, while differences between the preceding crops pea and winter wheat, and wheat and maize were not significant. Repeated measurements of canopy development and leaf color during the growing season revealed a higher N-availability after pea as preceding crop. However, decreased growth after maize was not completely compensated for by high N-fertilizer doses. Overall, the causes for the differences in sugar yield between the preceding crops remained open. The results do not support concerns about substantial yield losses in sugar beet production due to a reduction in the cropping interval from 3 to 2 years. Nevertheless, short rotations with maize and sugar beet might increase the risk of Rhizoctonia solani crown and root rot infestation. Leguminous crops such as pea offer the potential for higher sugar beet yield with lower N-fertilizer doses.
Issue Date
2018
Journal
Frontiers in plant science 
Organization
Institut für Zuckerrübenforschung 
ISSN
1664-462X
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media