Augmented Reality for Presenting Real-Time Data During Students’ Laboratory Work: Comparing a Head-Mounted Display With a Separate Display

2022-03-07 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Augmented Reality for Presenting Real-Time Data During Students’ Laboratory Work: Comparing a Head-Mounted Display With a Separate Display​
Thees, M.; Altmeyer, K.; Kapp, S.; Rexigel, E.; Beil, F.; Klein, P. & Malone, S. et al.​ (2022) 
Frontiers in Psychology13.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.804742 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Thees, Michael; Altmeyer, Kristin; Kapp, Sebastian; Rexigel, Eva; Beil, Fabian; Klein, Pascal; Malone, Sarah; Brünken, Roland; Kuhn, Jochen
Abstract
Multimedia learning theories suggest presenting associated pieces of information in spatial and temporal contiguity. New technologies like Augmented Reality allow for realizing these principles in science laboratory courses by presenting virtual real-time information during hands-on experimentation. Spatial integration can be achieved by pinning virtual representations of measurement data to corresponding real components. In the present study, an Augmented Reality-based presentation format was realized via a head-mounted display and contrasted to a separate display, which provided a well-arranged data matrix in spatial distance to the real components and was therefore expected to result in a spatial split-attention effect. Two groups of engineering students (N = 107; Augmented Reality vs. separate display) performed six experiments exploring fundamental laws of electric circuits. Cognitive load and conceptual knowledge acquisition were assessed as main outcome variables. In contrast to our hypotheses and previous findings, the Augmented Reality group did not report lower extraneous load and the separate display group showed higher learning gains. The pre- and posttest assessing conceptual knowledge were monitored by eye tracking. Results indicate that the condition affected the visual relevancy of circuit diagrams to final problem completion. The unexpected reverse effects could be traced back to emphasizing coherence formation processes regarding multiple measurements.
Issue Date
7-March-2022
Journal
Frontiers in Psychology 
eISSN
1664-1078
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media