Realizing the potential of metallic iron for the mitigation of toxics: flee or adapt?

2022-08-02 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Realizing the potential of metallic iron for the mitigation of toxics: flee or adapt?​
Konadu-Amoah, B.; Hu, R.; Cao, V.; Tao, R.; Yang, H.; Ndé-Tchoupé, A. I. & Gwenzi, W. et al.​ (2022) 
Applied Water Science12(9) art. 217​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-022-01738-9 

Documents & Media

13201_2022_Article_1738.pdf823.59 kBAdobe PDF

License

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Konadu-Amoah, Bernard; Hu, Rui; Cao, Viet; Tao, Ran; Yang, Huichen; Ndé-Tchoupé, Arnaud I.; Gwenzi, Willis; Ruppert, Hans ; Noubactep, Chicgoua 
Abstract
Metallic iron (Fe0) has been increasingly used to remove toxics from water over the past three decades. However, the idea that metallic iron (Fe0) is not an environmental reducing agent has been vigorously refuted. Researchers presenting their findings in a scientific journal have to accept the burden of proving that their argument has any validity. This 30-year-lasting discussion within the Fe0 remediation community is alien to electro-chemists, as it is a century-old knowledge. Nevertheless, the peer-reviewed literature on “remediation using Fe0” seems to be dominated by evaluators thinking that Fe0 is a reducing agent. This communication challenges the view that Fe0 donates any electron to any dissolved species. The sole goal is to reconcile a proven efficient technology with its scientific roots and enable the design of better Fe0 remediation systems.
Issue Date
2-August-2022
Journal
Applied Water Science 
Language
English
Sponsor
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022

Reference

Citations


Social Media