Manual and automated analysis of atrophy patterns in dementia with Lewy bodies on MRI

2022-03-24 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Manual and automated analysis of atrophy patterns in dementia with Lewy bodies on MRI​
Khadhraoui, E.; Müller, S. J.; Hansen, N.; Riedel, C. H.; Langer, P.; Timäeus, C. & Wiltfang, J. et al.​ (2022) 
BMC Neurology22(1) art. 114​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02642-0 

Documents & Media

12883_2022_Article_2642.pdf1.25 MBAdobe PDF

License

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Khadhraoui, Eya; Müller, Sebastian J.; Hansen, Niels; Riedel, Christian H.; Langer, Philip; Timäeus, Charles; Wiltfang, Jens; Bouter, Caroline; Lange, Claudia; Ernst, Marielle
Abstract
Abstract Background Dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) is the second most common dementia type in patients older than 65 years. Its atrophy patterns remain unknown. Its similarities to Parkinson's disease and differences from Alzheimer's disease are subjects of current research. Methods The aim of our study was (i) to form a group of patients with DLB (and a control group) and create a 3D MRI data set (ii) to volumetrically analyze the entire brain in these groups, (iii) to evaluate visual and manual metric measurements of the innominate substance for real-time diagnosis, and (iv) to compare our groups and results with the latest literature. We identified 102 patients with diagnosed DLB in our psychiatric and neurophysiological archives. After exclusion, 63 patients with valid 3D data sets remained. We compared them with a control group of 25 patients of equal age and sex distribution. We evaluated the atrophy patterns in both (1) manually and (2) via Fast Surfers segmentation and volumetric calculations. Subgroup analyses were done of the CSF data and quality of 3D T1 data sets. Results Concordant with the literature, we detected moderate, symmetric atrophy of the hippocampus, entorhinal cortex and amygdala, as well as asymmetric atrophy of the right parahippocampal gyrus in DLB. The caudate nucleus was unaffected in patients with DLB, while all the other measured territories were slightly too moderately atrophied. The area under the curve analysis of the left hippocampus volume ratio (< 3646mm3) revealed optimal 76% sensitivity and 100% specificity (followed by the right hippocampus and left amygdala). The substantia innominata’s visual score attained a 51% optimal sensitivity and 84% specificity, and the measured distance 51% optimal sensitivity and 68% specificity in differentiating DLB from our control group. Conclusions In contrast to other studies, we observed a caudate nucleus sparing atrophy of the whole brain in patients with DLB. As the caudate nucleus is known to be the last survivor in dopamine-uptake, this could be the result of an overstimulation or compensation mechanism deserving further investigation. Its relative hypertrophy compared to all other brain regions could enable an imaging based identification of patients with DLB via automated segmentation and combined volumetric analysis of the hippocampus and amygdala.
Issue Date
24-March-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Journal
BMC Neurology 
eISSN
1471-2377
Language
English
Sponsor
Georg-August-Universität Göttingen
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2022

Reference

Citations


Social Media