Transluminal angioplasty and stenting versus conservative treatment in patients with symptomatic basilar artery stenosis. Perspective for future clinical trials

2016 | journal article

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Transluminal angioplasty and stenting versus conservative treatment in patients with symptomatic basilar artery stenosis. Perspective for future clinical trials​
Maier, I. L. ; Karch, A. ; Lipke, C.; Behme, D. ; Mpotsaris, A.; Kabbasch, C. & Liebig, T. et al.​ (2016) 
Clinical Neuroradiology, pp. 1​-6​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-016-0528-x 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Maier, Ilko L. ; Karch, André ; Lipke, Christina; Behme, Daniel ; Mpotsaris, Anastasios; Kabbasch, Christoph; Liebig, Thomas; Faymonville, Andrea; Reich, Arno; Nikoubashman, Omid; Buhk, Jan-Hendrik; von Schoenfeld, Patrick; Weber, Werner; Mikolajczyk, Rafael T.; Bähr, Mathias ; Knauth, Michael ; Kallenberg, Kai ; Liman, Jan 
Abstract
Two recent randomized controlled trials (RCT) consistently showed superiority of aggressive medical treatment versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) in patients with intracranial artery stenosis. Patients with symptomatic basilar stenosis have a higher long-term risk of recurrent stroke compared to patients with anterior circulation stenosis but no study has specifically focused on the role of PTAS in this subgroup. The aim of our study was to investigate the subgroup of patients with symptomatic basilar artery stenosis to find evidence for the feasibility of a future clinical trial.
Issue Date
2016
Journal
Clinical Neuroradiology 
eISSN
1869-1447
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media