Understanding and Improving Risk Assessment After Myocardial Infarction Using Automated Left Ventricular Shape Analysis

2022 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Understanding and Improving Risk Assessment After Myocardial Infarction Using Automated Left Ventricular Shape Analysis​
Corral Acero, J.; Schuster, A. ; Zacur, E.; Lange, T.; Stiermaier, T.; Backhaus, S. J.   & Thiele, H. et al.​ (2022) 
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging15(9) pp. 1563​-1574​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2021.11.027 

Documents & Media

License

Published Version

Usage license

Details

Authors
Corral Acero, Jorge; Schuster, Andreas ; Zacur, Ernesto; Lange, Torben; Stiermaier, Thomas; Backhaus, Sören Jan ; Thiele, Holger; Bueno-Orovio, Alfonso; Lamata, Pablo; Eitel, Ingo; Grau, Vicente
Abstract
Background Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and end-systolic volume (ESV) remain the main imaging biomarkers for post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) risk stratification. However, they are limited to global systolic function and fail to capture functional and anatomical regional abnormalities, hindering their performance in risk stratification. Objectives This study aimed to identify novel 3-dimensional (3D) imaging end-systolic (ES) shape and contraction descriptors toward risk-related features and superior prognosis in AMI. Methods A multicenter cohort of AMI survivors (n = 1,021; median age 63 years; 74.5% male) who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at a median of 3 days after infarction were considered for this study. The clinical endpoint was the 12-month rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACE; n = 73), consisting of all-cause death, reinfarction, and new congestive heart failure. A fully automated pipeline was developed to segment CMR images, build 3D statistical models of shape and contraction in AMI, and find the 3D patterns related to MACE occurrence. Results The novel ES shape markers proved to be superior to ESV (median cross-validated area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve 0.681 [IQR: 0.679-0.684] vs 0.600 [IQR: 0.598-0.602]; P < 0.001); and 3D contraction to LVEF (0.716 [IQR: 0.714-0.718] vs 0.681 [IQR: 0.679-0.684]; P < 0.001) in MACE occurrence prediction. They also contributed to a significant improvement in a multivariable setting including CMR markers, cardiovascular risk factors, and basic patient characteristics (0.747 [IQR: 0.745-0.749]; P < 0.001). Based on these novel 3D descriptors, 3 impairments caused by AMI were identified: global, anterior, and basal, the latter being the most complementary signature to already known predictors. Conclusions The quantification of 3D differences in ES shape and contraction, enabled by a fully automated pipeline, improves post-AMI risk prediction and identifies shape and contraction patterns related to MACE occurrence.
Issue Date
2022
Journal
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging 
Organization
Klinik für Kardiologie und Pneumologie ; Universitätsmedizin Göttingen ; Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung e.V. 
ISSN
1936-878X
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media