Clinical performance of CAD-CAM partial-coverage restorations: Experienced versus less-experienced operators

2022-11-04 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Clinical performance of CAD-CAM partial-coverage restorations: Experienced versus less-experienced operators​
Lechte, C.; Hausdörfer, T.; Kanzow, P. ; Rödig, T. & Wiegand, A.​ (2022) 
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry128(6) pp. 1245​-1251​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2022.09.011 

Documents & Media

License

Usage license

Details

Authors
Lechte, Clemens; Hausdörfer, Tim; Kanzow, Philipp ; Rödig, Tina; Wiegand, Annette
Abstract
Statement of problem: Less-experienced operators have been shown to require additional training to achieve results similar to those of experienced operators. However, clinical data comparing the survival and success of ceramic restorations by experienced and less-experienced operators by using the computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) technology are lacking. Purpose: The purpose of this retrospective clinical study was to analyze and compare the clinical performance of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate restorations fabricated by less-experienced (predoctoral dental students) and experienced (dentists) operators. Material and methods: Patients who received an adhesively luted CAD-CAM lithium disilicate restoration between 2011 and 2019 were included in the study. Clinical performance was assessed by calibrated examiners by using World Dental Federation (FDI) criteria. Success and survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and statistically compared by log-rank tests and univariate Cox regression analyses. FDI criteria were compared by using Mann-Whitney-U tests (α=.05). Results: Ninety-two restorations (students: n=65, dentists: n=27) were assessed (mean ±standard deviation time from insertion: 4.04 ±1.55 years). The survival rates after 2 years (students: 93.8%, mean annual failure rate [mAFR]: 3.1%; dentist: 96.3%, mAFR: 1.9%) and after 4 years (students: 87.3%, mAFR: 3.3%; dentists: 88.3%, mAFR: 3.1%) were not significantly different (P=.525). Also, success rates after 2 (students: 90.8%, mAFR: 4.7%; dentists: 92.6%, mAFR: 3.8%) and 4 years (students: 82.4%, mAFR: 4.7%; dentists: 76.1%, mAFR: 6.6%) were not significantly different (P=.778). FDI criteria were also not significantly different between less-experienced and experienced operators (P≥.110). Conclusions: Operator experience did not affect the short-term clinical performance of CAD-CAM lithium disilicate restorations.
Issue Date
4-November-2022
Journal
The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 
Organization
Poliklinik für Präventive Zahnmedizin, Parodontologie und Kariologie 
ISSN
0022-3913
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media