Reproductive inequality among males in the genus Pan

2023 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Reproductive inequality among males in the genus Pan​
Mouginot, M.; Cheng, L.; Wilson, M. L.; Feldblum, J. T.; Städele, V.; Wroblewski, E. E. & Vigilant, L. et al.​ (2023) 
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences378(1883) art. 20220301​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2022.0301 

Documents & Media

License

Usage license

Details

Authors
Mouginot, Maud; Cheng, Leveda; Wilson, Michael L.; Feldblum, Joseph T.; Städele, Veronika; Wroblewski, Emily E.; Vigilant, Linda; Hahn, Beatrice H.; Li, Yingying; Gilby, Ian C.; Surbeck, Martin
Abstract
Reproductive inequality, or reproductive skew, drives natural selection, but has been difficult to assess, particularly for males in species with promiscuous mating and slow life histories, such as bonobos ( Pan paniscus ) and chimpanzees ( Pan troglodytes ). Although bonobos are often portrayed as more egalitarian than chimpanzees, genetic studies have found high male reproductive skew in bonobos. Here, we discuss mechanisms likely to affect male reproductive skew in Pan , then re-examine skew patterns using paternity data from published work and new data from the Kokolopori Bonobo Reserve, Democratic Republic of Congo and Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Using the multinomial index ( M ), we found considerable overlap in skew between the species, but the highest skew occurred among bonobos. Additionally, for two of three bonobo communities, but no chimpanzee communities, the highest ranking male had greater siring success than predicted by priority-of-access. Thus, an expanded dataset covering a broader demographic range confirms that bonobos have high male reproductive skew. Detailed comparison of data from Pan highlights that reproductive skew models should consider male–male dynamics including the effect of between-group competition on incentives for reproductive concessions, but also female grouping patterns and factors related to male–female dynamics including the expression of female choice. This article is part of the theme issue ‘Evolutionary ecology of inequality’.
Issue Date
2023
Journal
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences 
Organization
Deutsches Primatenzentrum 
ISSN
0962-8436
eISSN
1471-2970
Language
English
Sponsor
National Geographic Society http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006363
Morris Animal Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001250
Harris Steel Group
Wilkie Foundation
University of Minnesota http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007249
Harvard University http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007229
Leakey Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005966
George Washington University http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007108
Franklin and Marshall College http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100012632
Jane Goodall Institute http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100017812
Arcus Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100016681
Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
William T. Grant Foundation http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100001143
National Science Foundation
Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100005156
Carnegie Corporation of New York http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000308
National Institutes of Health http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002
Margo Marsh, Mazuri
Windibrow Foundation
Duke University http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006510
Leo S. Guthman Fund http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100009788

Reference

Citations


Social Media