Voice Pitch – A Valid Indicator of One’s Unfaithfulness in Committed Relationships?

2020 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Voice Pitch – A Valid Indicator of One’s Unfaithfulness in Committed Relationships?​
Schild, C.; Stern, J.; Penke, L. & Zettler, I.​ (2020) 
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology7(3) pp. 245​-260​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-020-00154-0 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Schild, Christoph; Stern, Julia; Penke, Lars; Zettler, Ingo
Abstract
Abstract Objectives When judging a male speakers’ likelihood to act sexually unfaithful in a committed relationship, listeners rely on the speakers’ voice pitch such that lower voice pitch is perceived as indicating being more unfaithful. In line with this finding, a recent study (Schild et al. Behavioral Ecology , 2020) provided first evidence that voice pitch might indeed be a valid cue to sexual infidelity in men. In this study, male speakers with lower voice pitch, as indicated by lower mean fundamental frequency (mean F0), were actually more likely to report having been sexually unfaithful in the past. Although these results fit the literature on vocal perceptions in contexts of sexual selection, the study was, as stated by the authors, underpowered. Further, the study solely focused on male speakers, which leaves it open whether these findings are also transferable to female speakers. Methods We reanalyzed three datasets (Asendorpf et al. European Journal of Personality, 25 , 16–30, 2011; Penke and Asendorpf Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95 , 1113–1135, 2008; Stern et al. 2020) that include voice recordings and infidelity data of overall 865 individuals (63,36% female) in order to test the replicability of and further extend past research. Results A significant negative link between mean F0 and self-reported infidelity was found in only one out of two datasets for men and only one out of three datasets for women. Two meta-analyses (accounting for the sample sizes and including data of Schild et al. 2020), however, suggest that lower mean F0 might be a valid indicator of higher probability of self-reported infidelity in both men and women. Conclusions In line with prior research, higher masculinity, as indicated by lower mean F0, seems to be linked to self-reported infidelity in both men and women. However, given methodological shortcomings, future studies should set out to further delve into these findings.
Issue Date
2020
Journal
Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 
eISSN
2198-7335
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media