Reliability of landmark identification for analysis of the temporomandibular joint in real-time MRI

2024-02-17 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Reliability of landmark identification for analysis of the temporomandibular joint in real-time MRI​
Mouchoux, J.; Meyer-Marcotty, P.; Sojka, F.; Dechent, P.; Klenke, D.; Wiechens, B. & Quast, A.​ (2024) 
Head & Face Medicine20(1) art. 10​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13005-024-00411-7 

Documents & Media

13005_2024_Article_411.pdf1.13 MBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Mouchoux, Jérémy; Meyer-Marcotty, Philipp; Sojka, Florian; Dechent, Peter; Klenke, Daniela; Wiechens, Bernhard; Quast, Anja
Abstract
Abstract Background Real-time magnetic resonance imaging (rtMRI) is essential for diagnosing and comprehending temporomandibular joint (TMJ) movements. Current methods for tracking and analysis require manual landmark placement on each acquisition frame. Therefore, our study aimed to assess the inter- and intra-rater reliability of placing cephalometric landmarks in frames from a dynamic real-time TMJ MRI. Material and methods Four real-time MRIs of the right TMJ were taken during mandibular movement at ten frames per second. Seven dentists identified ten landmarks on two frames (intercuspal position—ICP—and maximum mouth opening—MMO) twice at a two-week interval, yielding 112 tracings. Six typical cephalometric measurements (angles and distances) were derived from these landmarks. The reliabilities of landmarks and measurements were evaluated using distance-based (dbICC), linear mixed effect model intraclass correlation (lmeICC), and standard ICC. Results The average inter-rater reliability for the landmarks stood at 0.92 (dbICC) and 0.93 (lmeICC). The intra-rater reliability scores were 0.97 and 0.98. Over 80% of the landmarks showed an ICC greater than 0.98 (inter-rater) and over 0.99 (intra-rater). The lowest landmark ICC was observed for the orbitale and the oblique ridge of the mandibular ramus. However, the cephalometric angle and distance measurements derived from these landmarks showed only moderate to good reliability, whereas the reliability in the frames with ICP was better than those with MMO. Measurements performed in the ICP frame were more reliable than measurements in the MMO frame. Conclusion While dentists reliably localize isolated landmarks in real-time MRIs, the cephalometric measurements derived from them remain inconsistent. The better results in ICP than MMO are probably due to a more familiar jaw position. The higher error rate of the TMJ measurements in MMO could be associated with a lack of training in real-time MRI analysis in dentistry.
Issue Date
17-February-2024
Journal
Head & Face Medicine 
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media