Free-breathing pediatric MRI with nonrigid motion correction and acceleration

2015 | journal article; research paper. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Free-breathing pediatric MRI with nonrigid motion correction and acceleration​
Cheng, J. Y.; Zhang, T.; Ruangwattanapaisarn, N.; Alley, M. T.; Uecker, M. ; Pauly, J. M. & Lustig, M. et al.​ (2015) 
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging42(2) pp. 407​-420​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.24785 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Cheng, Joseph Y.; Zhang, Tao; Ruangwattanapaisarn, Nichanan; Alley, Marcus T.; Uecker, Martin ; Pauly, John M.; Lustig, Michael; Vasanawala, Shreyas S.
Abstract
PurposeTo develop and assess motion correction techniques for high-resolution pediatric abdominal volumetric magnetic resonance images acquired free-breathing with high scan efficiency. Materials and MethodsFirst, variable-density sampling and radial-like phase-encode ordering were incorporated into the 3D Cartesian acquisition. Second, intrinsic multichannel butterfly navigators were used to measure respiratory motion. Lastly, these estimates are applied for both motion-weighted data-consistency in a compressed sensing and parallel imaging reconstruction, and for nonrigid motion correction using a localized autofocusing framework. With Institutional Review Board approval and informed consent/assent, studies were performed on 22 consecutive pediatric patients. Two radiologists independently scored the images for overall image quality, degree of motion artifacts, and sharpness of hepatic vessels and the diaphragm. The results were assessed using paired Wilcoxon test and weighted kappa coefficient for interobserver agreements. ResultsThe complete procedure yielded significantly better overall image quality (mean score of 4.7 out of 5) when compared to using no correction (mean score of 3.4, P<0.05) and to using motion-weighted accelerated imaging (mean score of 3.9, P<0.05). With an average scan time of 28 seconds, the proposed method resulted in comparable image quality to conventional prospective respiratory-triggered acquisitions with an average scan time of 91 seconds (mean score of 4.5). ConclusionWith the proposed methods, diagnosable high-resolution abdominal volumetric scans can be obtained from free-breathing data acquisitions. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2015;42:407-420.
Issue Date
2015
Journal
Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 
ISSN
1053-1807
eISSN
1522-2586

Reference

Citations


Social Media