Forensic assessment Are biological facts useful?

2010 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Forensic assessment Are biological facts useful?​
Stolpmann, G. ; Fromberger, P. ; Jordan, K.   & Mueller, J. L. ​ (2010) 
Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform / Journal of Criminology an Penal Reform93(4) pp. 300​-312​.​

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Stolpmann, Georg ; Fromberger, Peter ; Jordan, Kirsten ; Mueller, Juergen Leo 
Abstract
Prognoses in forensic psychiatry are demanded and delivered on a daily basis. Given the multitude of different causes, it is not surprising that prognostic questions also widely differ. To predict the likelihood of criminal re-offences, risk checklists are used; biological parameters are rarely considered. This text outlines exemplary (neuro-)biological investigations and methods and their relevance to the diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric disturbances. Their possible relevance with regard to forensic psychiatric prognoses is also discussed. It is suggested that biological facts must be investigated as additional predictors.
Issue Date
2010
Status
published
Publisher
Carl Heymanns Verlag Kg
Journal
Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform / Journal of Criminology an Penal Reform 
ISSN
0026-9301

Reference

Citations