Multi-site voxel-based morphometry - Not quite there yet

2011 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Multi-site voxel-based morphometry - Not quite there yet​
Focke, N. K.; Helms, G.; Kaspar, S.; Diederich, C.; Toth, V.; Dechent, P. & Mohr, A. et al.​ (2011) 
NeuroImage56(3) pp. 1164​-1170​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.02.029 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Focke, Niels K.; Helms, G.; Kaspar, S.; Diederich, Christine; Toth, V.; Dechent, Peter; Mohr, A.; Paulus, Walter J.
Abstract
Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a widely applied method in computational neurosciences but it is currently recommended to compare only data collected at a single MRI scanner. Multi-site VBM would be a desirable approach to increase group size and, thus, statistical power. We aimed to assess if multi-site VBM is feasible on similar hardware and compare the magnitude of inter- and intra-scanner differences. 18 healthy subjects were scanned in two identical 3 T MRI scanners using different head coil designs, twice in scanner A and once in scanner B. 3D T1-weighted images were processed with SPM8 and FSL4.1 and compared as paired t-test (scan versus re-scan) on a voxel basis by means of a general linear model (GLM). Additionally, coefficient-of-difference (coeffD) maps were calculated for respective pairs of gray matter segmentations. We found considerable inter-scanner differences clearly exceeding a commonly used GLM significance threshold of p<0.05 (FWE corrected). The spatial pattern of detected differences was dependent on whether SPM8 or FSL4.1 was used. The inclusion of global correcting factors either aggravated (SPM8) or reduced the GLM detected differences ( FSL4.1). The coeffD analysis revealed markedly higher variability within the FSL4.1 stream both for the inter- and the intra-scanner comparison. A lowered bias cutoff (30 mm FWHM) in SPM8 improved the comparability for cortical areas. lima-scanner scan/re-scan differences were generally weaker and did not exceed a p<0.05 (FWE corrected) threshold in the GEM analysis. At 3 T profound inter-scanner differences are to be expected that could severely confound an unbalanced VBM analysis. These are like related to the receive bias of the radio-frequency hardware. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Issue Date
2011
Status
published
Publisher
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science
Journal
NeuroImage 
ISSN
1053-8119
Sponsor
University Medical Center Gottingen("Ruckkehrer-Startforderung")

Reference

Citations


Social Media