N fluxes in an agricultural catchment under monsoon climate: A budget approach at different scales

2012 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​N fluxes in an agricultural catchment under monsoon climate: A budget approach at different scales​
Kettering, J.; Park, J.-H.; Lindner, S.; Lee, B.; Tenhunen, J. & Kuzyakov, Y.​ (2012) 
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment161 pp. 101​-111​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2012.07.027 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Kettering, Janine; Park, Ji-Hyung; Lindner, Steve; Lee, Bora; Tenhunen, John; Kuzyakov, Yakov
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop options for a more sustainable catchment management, resulting in a reduction of agricultural non-point pollution of water resources in South Korean agricultural catchments. Therefore, an N budget analysis was conducted, which related N inputs into soil under intensive agriculture to N outputs at both field and catchment scale in a mountainous catchment in South Korea. The N budget of all investigated crops was positive, with total N inputs exceeding N outputs by 2.8 times. Radish showed the highest N uptake efficiency (43-45%), whereas rice showed the lowest with 24-30%. At the catchment scale, agriculture contributed over 90% to the maximum N surplus (473 Mg). Rice and radish, with over 100 Mg N surplus each, contributed the largest part. Comparing these results to the N export in the catchment outlet, it was found that N leaching and surface runoff were the dominant loss pathways, leading to a seasonal inorganic N export of 329 Mg. Because fertilizer N was the major N input (>50%) for all crop types except soybean, its reduction was identified as the major scope of action for N savings at the field and catchment scale. The currently observed trend of land use change from annual to perennial crops additionally assists the reduction of N surplus but shows only a spatially limited applicability for the future. Further measures like split applications, application timing to match crop needs and cover crops during the fallow complement the attempt. (C) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Issue Date
2012
Status
published
Publisher
Elsevier Science Bv
Journal
Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 
ISSN
0167-8809

Reference

Citations


Social Media