Long-term results of implant-supported over-dentures retained by double crowns: a practice-based retrospective study after minimally 10 years follow-up

2013 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Long-term results of implant-supported over-dentures retained by double crowns: a practice-based retrospective study after minimally 10 years follow-up​
Frisch, E.; Ziebolz, D. & Rinke, S.​ (2013) 
Clinical Oral Implants Research24(12) pp. 1281​-1287​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02568.x 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Frisch, Eberhard; Ziebolz, Dirk; Rinke, Sven
Abstract
BackgroundDifferent concepts regarding the number of implants and attachment systems for the preparation of implant-supported over-dentures (IODs) have been discussed. Nonetheless, long-term results for double-crown-retained IODs with an observational period of more than 10years are still rare in the literature. ObjectiveThe aim of this practice-based study was to retrospectively evaluate the long-term clinical outcome (success/survival rates, technical/biological complications) of IODs retained by double crowns. Material and methodsIn a private practice, 36 non-smoking edentulous patients were restored between 1991 and 2002 with double-crown-retained IODs supported by 2-6 implants. For the retrospective evaluation of implant and prosthetic survival (in-situ criterion) and success (event-free observational period), only those patients were included who regularly (at least once a year) participated in a professional maintenance programme and who had a functional period for the restoration of more than 10years. ResultsTwenty-two patients (12 Women/10 men, mean age 60.19.8years) with 89 implants supporting nine maxillary and 13 mandibulary dentures (mean number of implants/prosthesis=4) met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up period was 14.1 +/- 2.8years. One implant failed after 4.9years (cumulative-survival rate: 98.9%). Seven implants in two patients showed peri-implantitis (prevalence: patient-based=9.1%/implant-based=8%). Five dentures were renewed (prosthetic-survival rate 77.3% Maintenance procedures (i.e. screw loosening or acrylic fractures) were required at a rate of 0.31/year and patient. ConclusionThis study indicates that IODs retained with double crowns offer predictable long-term performance with a limited incidence of biological and technical complications.
Issue Date
2013
Status
published
Publisher
Wiley-blackwell
Journal
Clinical Oral Implants Research 
ISSN
1600-0501; 0905-7161

Reference

Citations


Social Media