Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity and Location Quantitative Analysis of Transmural Perfusion Gradients by High-Resolution MRI Versus FFR

2013 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Assessment of Coronary Artery Stenosis Severity and Location Quantitative Analysis of Transmural Perfusion Gradients by High-Resolution MRI Versus FFR​
Chiribiri, A.; Hautvast, G. L. T. F.; Lockie, T.; Schuster, A.; Bigalke, B.; Olivotti, L. & Redwood, S. R. et al.​ (2013) 
JACC Cardiovascular Imaging6(5) pp. 600​-609​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2012.09.019 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Chiribiri, Amedeo; Hautvast, Gilion L. T. F.; Lockie, Timothy; Schuster, Andreas; Bigalke, Boris; Olivotti, Luca; Redwood, Simon R.; Breeuwer, Marcel; Plein, Sven; Nagel, Eike
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study sought to test the hypothesis that transmural perfusion gradients (TPG) on adenosine stress myocardial perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) predict hemodynamically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) as defined by fractional flow reserve (FFR). BACKGROUND Myocardial ischemia affects the subendocardial layers of the left ventricular myocardium earlier and more severely than the outer layers, and the identification of TPG should be sensitive and specific for the diagnosis of CAD. Previous studies have shown that high spatial resolution myocardial perfusion CMR allows quantitation of TPG between the subendocardium and the subepicardium. METHODS Sixty-seven patients (53 men, age 61 +/- 9 years) underwent coronary angiography and high-resolution (1.2 x 1.2-mm in-plane) adenosine stress perfusion CMR at 3.0-1. TPG was calculated for 3 coronary territories. Visual analysis was performed to identify myocardial ischemia. FFR was measured in all vessels with >= 50% severity stenosis. FFR <0.8 was considered hemodynamically significant. In a training group of 30 patients, the optimal threshold of TPG to detect significant CAD was determined (Group 1). This threshold was then tested prospectively in the remaining 37 patients (Group 2). RESULTS In Group 1, a 20% TPG provided the best diagnostic threshold on both per-segment and per-patient analysis. Applied to Group 2, this threshold yielded a sensitivity of 0.78, specificity of 0.94, and area under the curve of 0.86 for the detection of CAD in a per-segment analysis and of 0.89, 0.83, and 0.86 in a per-patient analysis, respectively. TPG had a similar diagnostic accuracy to visual assessment. Linear regression analysis showed a relationship between TPG and FFR values, with r = 0.63 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The quantitative analysis of transmural perfusion gradients on high-resolution myocardial perfusion CMR accurately predicts hemodynamically significant CAD as defined by FFR. A TPG diagnostic threshold of 20% is as accurate as visual assessment. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2013;6: 600-9) (C) 2013 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
Issue Date
2013
Status
published
Publisher
Elsevier Science Inc
Journal
JACC Cardiovascular Imaging 
ISSN
1936-878X

Reference

Citations


Social Media