Do manual and voxel-based morphometry measure the same? A proof of concept study

2014 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Do manual and voxel-based morphometry measure the same? A proof of concept study​
Focke, N. K.; Trost, S.; Paulus, W. J.; Falkai, P. & Gruber, O.​ (2014) 
Frontiers in Psychiatry5 art. 39​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2014.00039 

Documents & Media

fpsyt-05-00039-g001.tif23.74 MBUnknownfpsyt-05-00039-g002.tif24.3 MBUnknownfpsyt-05-00039-g003.tif35.4 MBUnknownfpsyt-05-00039.pdf1.4 MBUnknown

License

Published Version

Attribution 3.0 CC BY 3.0

Details

Authors
Focke, Niels K.; Trost, Sarah; Paulus, Walter J.; Falkai, Peter; Gruber, Oliver
Abstract
Voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a commonly used method to study volumetric variations on a whole brain basis. However, it is often criticized for potential confounds, mainly based on imperfect spatial registration. We therefore aimed to evaluate if VBM and "gold standard" manual volumetry are measuring the same effects with respect to subcortical gray matter volumes. Manual regions-of-interest were drawn in the hippocampus, amygdala, nucleus accumbens, thalamus, putamen, pallidum, and caudate nucleus bilaterally. Resulting volumes were used for a whole brain VBM correlation analysis with Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8). The hippocampus, amygdala, putamen, and caudate nucleus were correctly identified by SPM using the contemporary high-dimensional normalization (DARTEL toolbox). This strongly suggests that VBM and manual volumetry both are indeed measuring the same effects with regard to subcortical brain structures.
Issue Date
2014
Status
published
Publisher
Frontiers Media S.A.
Journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry 
eISSN
1664-0640
ISSN
1664-0640
eISSN
1664-0640
Language
English

Reference

Citations


Social Media