Can multi-subpopulation reference sets improve the genomic predictive ability for pigs?

2015 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Can multi-subpopulation reference sets improve the genomic predictive ability for pigs?​
Fangmann, A.; Bergfelder-Drueing, S.; Tholen, E.; Simianer, H. & Erbe, M.​ (2015) 
Journal of Animal Science93(12) pp. 5618​-5630​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2015-9508 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Fangmann, A.; Bergfelder-Drueing, Sarah; Tholen, Ernst; Simianer, Henner; Erbe, Malena
Abstract
In most countries and for most livestock species, genomic evaluations are obtained from within-breed analyses. To achieve reliable breeding values, however, a sufficient reference sample size is essential. To increase this size, the use of multibreed reference populations for small populations is considered a suitable option in other species. Over decades, the separate breeding work of different pig breeding organizations in Germany has led to stratified subpopulations in the breed German Large White. Due to this fact and the limited number of Large White animals available in each organization, there was a pressing need for ascertaining if multi-subpopulation genomic prediction is superior compared with within-subpopulation prediction in pigs. Direct genomic breeding values were estimated with genomic BLUP for the trait "number of piglets born alive" using genotype data (Illumina Porcine 60K SNP BeadChip) from 2,053 German Large White animals from five different commercial pig breeding companies. To assess the prediction accuracy of within- and multi-subpopulation reference sets, a random 5-fold cross-validation with 20 replications was performed. The five subpopulations considered were only slightly differentiated from each other. However, the prediction accuracy of the multi-subpopulations approach was not better than that of the within-subpopulation evaluation, for which the predictive ability was already high. Reference sets composed of closely related multi-subpopulation sets performed better than sets of distantly related subpopulations but not better than the within-subpopulation approach. Despite the low differentiation of the five subpopulations, the genetic connectedness between these different subpopulations seems to be too small to improve the prediction accuracy by applying multi-subpopulation reference sets. Consequently, resources should be used for enlarging the reference population within subpopulation, for example, by adding genotyped females.
Issue Date
2015
Status
published
Publisher
Amer Soc Animal Science
Journal
Journal of Animal Science 
ISSN
1525-3163; 0021-8812

Reference

Citations


Social Media