Features of the Retinotopic Representation in the Visual Wulst of a Laterally Eyed Bird, the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata)

2015 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Features of the Retinotopic Representation in the Visual Wulst of a Laterally Eyed Bird, the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata)​
Michael, N.; Loewel, S. & Bischof, H.-J.​ (2015) 
PLoS ONE10(4) art. e0124917​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124917 

Documents & Media

journal.pone.0124917.pdf4.29 MBAdobe PDF

License

Published Version

Attribution 4.0 CC BY 4.0

Details

Authors
Michael, Neethu; Loewel, Siegrid; Bischof, Hans-Joachim
Abstract
The visual wulst of the zebra finch comprises at least two retinotopic maps of the contralateral eye. As yet, it is not known how much of the visual field is represented in the wulst neuronal maps, how the organization of the maps is related to the retinal architecture, and how information from the ipsilateral eye is involved in the activation of the wulst. Here, we have used auto-fluorescent flavoprotein imaging and classical anatomical methods to investigate such characteristics of the most posterior map of the multiple retinotopic representations. We found that the visual wulst can be activated by visual stimuli from a large part of the visual field of the contralateral eye. Horizontally, the visual field representation extended from -5 degrees beyond the beak tip up to +125 degrees laterally. Vertically, a small strip from -10 degrees below to about +25 degrees above the horizon activated the visual wulst. Although retinal ganglion cells had a much higher density around the fovea and along a strip extending from the fovea towards the beak tip, these areas were not overrepresented in the wulst map. The wulst area activated from the foveal region of the ipsilateral eye, overlapped substantially with the middle of the three contralaterally activated regions in the visual wulst, and partially with the other two. Visual wulst activity evoked by stimulation of the frontal visual field was stronger with contralateral than with binocular stimulation. This confirms earlier electrophysiological studies indicating an inhibitory influence of the activation of the ipsilateral eye on wulst activity elicited by stimulating the contralateral eye. The lack of a foveal overrepresentation suggests that identification of objects may not be the primary task of the zebra finch visual wulst. Instead, this brain area may be involved in the processing of visual information necessary for spatial orientation.
Issue Date
2015
Status
published
Publisher
Public Library Science
Journal
PLoS ONE 
ISSN
1932-6203
Sponsor
Open-Access-Publikationsfonds 2015

Reference

Citations


Social Media