Anchoring in social context
2015 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.
Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history
Documents & Media
Details
- Authors
- Meub, Lukas; Proeger, Till E.
- Abstract
- The anchoring-and-adjustment heuristic has been studied in numerous experimental settings and is increasingly drawn upon to explain systematically biased decisions in economic areas as diverse as auctions, real estate pricing, sports betting and forecasting. In these cases, anchors result from publicly observable and aggregated decisions of other market participants. However, experimental studies have neglected this social dimension by focusing on neutral, experimenter-provided anchors in purely individualistic settings. We present a novel experimental design with a socially derived anchor, monetary incentives for unbiased decisions and feedback on performance to more accurately implement market conditions. Despite these factors, we find robust effects for the socially derived anchor, an increased bias for higher cognitive load, and only weak learning effects. A comparison to a neutral anchor shows that the social context increases biased behavior. Further, we find that this increase is not driven by differences in perceived relevance of anchor values. Our results support the assumption that anchoring remains a valid explanation for systematically biased decisions within market contexts. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
- Issue Date
- 2015
- Status
- published
- Publisher
- Elsevier Science Inc
- Journal
- Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics
- ISSN
- 2214-8051; 2214-8043