Assessing different components of three-dimensional forest structure with single-scan terrestrial laser scanning: A case study

2016 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Assessing different components of three-dimensional forest structure with single-scan terrestrial laser scanning: A case study​
Seidel, D. ; Ehbrecht, M. & Puettmann, K.​ (2016) 
Forest Ecology and Management381 pp. 196​-208​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.09.036 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Seidel, Dominik ; Ehbrecht, Martin; Puettmann, Klaus
Abstract
Efficient quantification of the three-dimensional forest structure is of increasing importance for our understanding of forest functions and services, but it remains challenging with conventional methods. We used a single-scan ground-based laser approach in stands with a known difference in management history and associated differences in structures. The data were used to test whether the measurement approach could distinguish various structural measures among the stands, including overall density, vertical structure, competitive conditions for regeneration, horizontal visibility, and three-dimensional structural variability. In general, our data reflected known differences in stand structure. However, in some cases the different measures showed contradicting results, highlighting the limited information represented in each measure when considered in isolation. At the same time, our results suggested that all components of stand structure do not develop in sync. The variability of horizontal and vertical structural heterogeneity appears to be a good indicator of structural elements, typically found in old-growth forests, i.e., spatially homogenous (scale independent) horizontal structural variability in combination with a scale-dependent vertical structural variability. In addition, our results provided information with direct management implications. For example, gap creation, a prominent practice in restoration treatments in the region, increased spatial variability, but the hard edges and removal of all trees inside the gap, are not reflecting structural conditions found in our old-growth stand. In summary, our results suggest that this new technology can efficiently provide objective and holistic inventories of stand structures. However, more work is needed to fully understand the implications of the novel structural measures for ecosystem processes and services. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier B.V.
Issue Date
2016
Journal
Forest Ecology and Management 
Organization
Fakultät für Forstwissenschaften und Waldökologie ; Burckhardt-Institut ; Abteilung Waldbau und Waldökologie der gemäßigten Zonen 
ISSN
1872-7042; 0378-1127

Reference

Citations


Social Media