Impact of radiotherapy on implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: A prospective observational study on implant survival and quality of life-Preliminary results

2016 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Impact of radiotherapy on implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: A prospective observational study on implant survival and quality of life-Preliminary results​
Ettl, T.; Weindler, J.; Gosau, M.; Mueller, S.; Hautmann, M.; Zeman, F. & Koller, M. T. et al.​ (2016) 
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery44(9) pp. 1453​-1462​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.07.016 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Ettl, Tobias; Weindler, Janet; Gosau, Martin; Mueller, Steffen; Hautmann, Matthias; Zeman, Florian; Koller, Michael T.; Papavasileiou, Dimitrios; Buergers, Ralf; Driemel, Oliver; Schneider, Isabel; Klingelhoeffer, Christoph; Meier, Johannes; Wahlmann, Ulrich; Reichert, Torsten E.
Abstract
Purpose: To study implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients with focus on implant survival and quality of life. Materials and methods: The prospective observational study presents preliminary results of 29 edentulous head neck cancer patients (20 patients after radiotherapy) with 165 OsseoSpeed implants. Implant success after 1-year follow-up was evaluated by means of the Albrektsson criteria. Quality of life was analysed with the EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-H&N35, and OHIP 14 questionnaires. Results: The overall implant survival rate after 1 year was 95.2% (157/165). Implant success measured by the Albrektsson criteria showed a lower success rate of 86.7% (143/165), mainly because of peri-implant marginal bone loss with a mean of 0.8 mm after 1 year. Xerostomia (p = 0.008), implant insertion within the radiation target volume (p = 0.09), implantation in transplanted bone (p = 0.05), and smoking (p = 0.041) were the main reasons for implant failure, followed by D4 bone quality, maxillary implant site, and insufficient primary stability. Speaking, swallowing, eating, as well as social integration and individual self-confidence had considerably improved 1 year after denture placement compared to before treatment. Conclusion: Implant-based prosthetic rehabilitation of head and neck cancer patients is possible at a calculable risk and significantly improves patients' quality of life. (C) 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Issue Date
2016
Status
published
Publisher
Churchill Livingstone
Journal
Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery 
ISSN
1878-4119; 1010-5182
Sponsor
DENTSPLY Implants, Molndal, Sweden [D-2008-44]

Reference

Citations


Social Media