No Scientific Debate in the Zero-Valent Iron Literature

2016 | journal article???letter_note???. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​No Scientific Debate in the Zero-Valent Iron Literature​
Noubactep, C. ​ (2016) 
CLEAN - Soil Air Water44(4) pp. 330​-332​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201400780 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Noubactep, Chicgoua 
Abstract
Since the 1930s, the modern science of aqueous iron corrosion has been established by scientists like J. O'M. Bockris, M. Cohen, U. R. Evans, Y. M. Kolotrykin, G. Okamoto, M. Pourbaix, H. H. Uhlig, or K. J. Vetter. Yet, the electrochemical nature of aqueous iron corrosion is seriously questioned by flawed science. Especially, metallic iron (Fe-0) was mistakenly introduced in the 1990s as an environmental reducing agent. Fe-0 was then successfully used in subsurface permeable reactive barriers to treat contaminated groundwater. This commentary recalls that observed contaminant degradation/reduction is not the cathodic reaction simultaneous to iron oxidative dissolution. It is concluded that the Fe-0 remediation community is working against creativity and innovation.
Issue Date
2016
Journal
CLEAN - Soil Air Water 
ISSN
1863-0669; 1863-0650

Reference

Citations


Social Media