Effect of body mass index in acute respiratory distress syndrome

2016 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Effect of body mass index in acute respiratory distress syndrome​
Chiumello, D.; Colombo, A.; Algieri, I.; Mietto, C.; Carlesso, E.; Crimella, F. & Cressoni, M. et al.​ (2016) 
BJA British Journal of Anaesthesia116(1) pp. 113​-121​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aev378 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Chiumello, Davide; Colombo, A.; Algieri, Ilaria; Mietto, Cristina; Carlesso, Eleonora; Crimella, Francesco; Cressoni, Massimo; Quintel, M.; Gattinoni, Luciano
Abstract
Background: Obesity is associated in healthy subjects with a great reduction in functional residual capacity and with a stiffening of lung and chest wall elastance, which promote alveolar collapse and hypoxaemia. Likewise, obese patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) could present greater derangements of respiratory mechanics than patients of normal weight. Methods: One hundred and one ARDS patients were enrolled. Partitioned respiratory mechanics and gas exchange were measured at 5 and 15 cm H2O of PEEP with a tidal volume of 6-8ml kg(-1) of predicted body weight. At 5 and 45 cm H2O of PEEP, two lung computed tomography scans were performed. Results: Patients were divided as follows according to BMI: normal weight (BMI <= 25 kgm(-2)), overweight (BMI between 25 and 30 kgm(-2)), and obese (BMI>30 kgm(-2)). Obese, overweight, and normal-weight groups presented a similar lung elastance (median [interquartile range], respectively: 17.7 [14.2-24.8], 20.9 [16.1-30.2], and 20.5 [15.2-23.6] cm H2O litre(-1) at 5 cm H2O of PEEP and 19.3 [15.5-26.3], 21.1 [17.4-29.2], and 17.1 [13.4-20.4] cm H2O litre(-1) at 15 cm H2O of PEEP) and chest elastance (respectively: 4.9 [3.18.8], 5.9 [3.8-8.7], and 7.8 [3.9-9.8] cm H2O litre(-1) at 5 cm H2O of PEEP and 6.5 [4.5-9.6], 6.6 [4.2-9.2], and 4.9 [2.4-7.6] cm H2O litre(-1) at 15 cm H2O of PEEP). Lung recruitability was not affected by the body weight (15.6 [6.3-23.4], 15.7 [9.8-22.2], and 11.3 [6.2-15.6]% for normal-weight, overweight, and obese groups, respectively). Lung gas volume was significantly lower whereas total superimposed pressure was significantly higher in the obese compared with the normal-weight group (1148 [680-1815] vs 827 [686-1213] ml and 17.4 [15.8-19.3] vs 19.3 [18.6-21.7] cm H2O, respectively). Conclusions: Obese ARDS patients do not present higher chest wall elastance and lung recruitability.
Issue Date
2016
Status
published
Publisher
Oxford Univ Press
Journal
BJA British Journal of Anaesthesia 
ISSN
1471-6771; 0007-0912

Reference

Citations


Social Media