Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper

2017 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Effects of tDCS on motor learning and memory formation: A consensus and critical position paper​
Buch, E. R.; Santarnecchi, E.; Antal, A.; Born, J.; Celnik, P. A.; Classen, J. & Gerloff, C. et al.​ (2017) 
Clinical Neurophysiology128(4) pp. 589​-603​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.01.004 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Buch, Ethan R.; Santarnecchi, Emiliano; Antal, Andrea; Born, Jan; Celnik, Pablo A.; Classen, Joseph; Gerloff, Christian; Hallett, Mark; Hummel, Friedhelm C.; Nitsche, Michael A.; Pascual-Leone, Alvaro; Paulus, Walter J.; Reis, Janine; Robertson, Edwin M.; Rothwell, John C.; Sandrini, Marco; Schambra, Heidi M.; Wassermann, Eric M.; Ziemann, Ulf; Cohen, Leonardo G.
Abstract
Motor skills are required for activities of daily living. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) applied in association with motor skill learning has been investigated as a tool for enhancing training effects in health and disease. Here, we review the published literature investigating whether tDCS can facilitate the acquisition, retention or adaptation of motor skills. Work in multiple laboratories is under-way to develop a mechanistic understanding of tDCS effects on different forms of learning and to optimize stimulation protocols. Efforts are required to improve reproducibility and standardization. Overall, reproducibility remains to be fully tested, effect sizes with present techniques vary over a wide range, and the basis of observed inter-individual variability in tDCS effects is incompletely understood. It is recommended that future studies explicitly state in the Methods the exploratory (hypothesis-generating) or hypothesis-driven (confirmatory) nature of the experimental designs. General research practices could be improved with prospective pre-registration of hypothesis-based investigations, more emphasis on the detailed description of methods (including all pertinent details to enable future modeling of induced current and experimental replication), and use of post-publication open data repositories. A checklist is proposed for reporting tDCS investigations in a way that can improve efforts to assess reproducibility. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd on behalf of International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology.
Issue Date
2017
Status
published
Publisher
Elsevier Ireland Ltd
Journal
Clinical Neurophysiology 
ISSN
1872-8952; 1388-2457

Reference

Citations


Social Media