Allergic contact dermatitis due to beta-blockers in eye drops: a retrospective analysis of multicentre surveillance data 1993-2004

2006 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Allergic contact dermatitis due to beta-blockers in eye drops: a retrospective analysis of multicentre surveillance data 1993-2004​
Jappe, U.; Uter, W.; Menezes de Padua, C. A.; Herbst, R. A. & Schnuch, A.​ (2006) 
Acta Dermato Venereologica86(6) pp. 509​-514​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-0162 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Jappe, Uta; Uter, Wolfgang; Menezes de Padua, Cristiane A.; Herbst, Rudolf A.; Schnuch, Axel
Abstract
Topically applied ophthalmic drugs are a potential cause of allergic contact dermatitis of the periorbital region. The objectives of this study were to assess the frequency and spectrum of contact allergy to topically applied beta-blocker containing eye drops. Data of the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) collected between 1993 and 2004 was analysed. Out of 112,430 patch-tested patients, 332 had been tested with their own topical anti-glaucoma eye drops containing different beta-blockers because of suspected allergic contact dermatitis. The frequency of positive test reactions was related to exposure intensity, as estimated by annual prescription rates in Germany. A total of 43/332 (12.95%) showed at least one positive patch test reaction. Positive reactions were observed to products containing timolol (n = 21), metipranolol (n = 13) and levobunolol (n = 11) without conceivable cross-reactivity. Whereas exposure to beta-blocker-containing eye drops remained stable over the years, as estimated by the prescription rates, a slight, non-significant increase in positive patch-reactions to these substances was noted. This is the first systematic analysis of a large set of data on patients' own beta-blocker topical medications, the results indicating that contact allergy should be considered as important, if rare, adverse event caused by this family of drugs.
Issue Date
2006
Status
published
Publisher
Taylor & Francis As
Journal
Acta Dermato Venereologica 
ISSN
0001-5555

Reference

Citations


Social Media