To resuscitate or not? The emergency physician's decision in the prehospital setting

2003 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​To resuscitate or not? The emergency physician's decision in the prehospital setting​
Mohr, M.; Busch, M.; Bahr, J. & Kettler, D.​ (2003) 
AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie38(5) pp. 341​-348​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2003-38948 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Mohr, M.; Busch, M.; Bahr, Jan; Kettler, Dietrich
Abstract
Objective: To identify factors affecting the decision to withhold resuscitative attempts or to terminate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in the prehospital setting. Methods: In a physician-based emergency medical system (EMS) standardised interviews with the emergency physicians were performed within 24 hours after unsuccessful or withheld CPR-efforts. Results: Over a period of one year 170 prehospital cardiac arrests were evaluated. 47 patients (28%) were declared dead on arrival by the emergency physician. The decision to withhold CPR was based on obvious clinical signs of death (32 patients) or the diagnosis of cardiac arrest due to severe trauma (8 patients). In 4 cases the terminal state of a fatal illness was the emergency physician's criterion not to initiate resuscitative efforts. In 3 patients an extended response time (more than 10 minutes) was mentioned, in combination with a primary rhythm of either asystole or electromechanical dissociation and additional information given by the family doctor. In 123 patients CPR was attempted. In 72 cases (59%) resuscitative efforts were terminated as no return and stabilisation of spontaneous circulation was achieved. In 58 patients the decision to stop CPR was based on the evidence of cardiac death. Additional criteria for the termination of the resuscitation attempt were the duration of CPF, an extended response time, pre-existing diseases, age, pupillary status, missing brain stem reflexes, the reason of cardiac arrest, information given by the family or the family doctor and secondarily evolving signs of death. In 14 patients the emergency physicians reported that their decision to terminate CPR was primarily based on these co-factors, the evidence of cardiac death was not explicitly mentioned in these cases. Conclusion: In the pre-hospital setting the decision to withhold or to withdraw CPR is mostly based on reliable criteria such as obvious clinical signs of death, fatal trauma or evidence of cardiac death. Nevertheless, in a small but considerable number of cases exceptions to this rule are made by emergency physicians.
Issue Date
2003
Status
published
Publisher
Georg Thieme Verlag Kg
Journal
AINS - Anästhesiologie · Intensivmedizin · Notfallmedizin · Schmerztherapie 
ISSN
0939-2661

Reference

Citations


Social Media