Impact of retrograde graft preservation in Perfadex-based experimental lung transplantation

2004 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Impact of retrograde graft preservation in Perfadex-based experimental lung transplantation​
Wittwer, T.; Franke, U.; Fehrenbach, A.; Meyer, D.; Sandhaus, T.; Pfeifer, F. & Dreyer, N. et al.​ (2004) 
Journal of Surgical Research117(2) pp. 239​-248​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2003.10.007 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Wittwer, Thorsten; Franke, U.; Fehrenbach, A.; Meyer, D.; Sandhaus, T.; Pfeifer, F.; Dreyer, N.; Mueller, T.; Schubert, H.; Richter, J.; Wahlers, T.
Abstract
Objective. Optimal preservation of postischemic organ function is a continuing challenge in clinical lung transplantation. Retrograde instillation of preservation solutions has theoretical advantages to achieve a homogeneous distribution in the lung due to perfusion of both the pulmonary and the bronchial circulation. Thus far, no systematic screening studies followed by in vivo large animal reevaluation including stereological analysis of intrapulmonary edema exist concerning the influence of retrograde preservation on postischemic lung function after preservation with low potassium dextran (LPD) solution (Perfadex). Materials and methods. For initial screening in an extracorporeal rat model eight lungs, each, were preserved for 4 h using antegrade or retrograde preservation with LPD solution (Perfadex; PERant/PERret). Respiratory and hemodynamic results after reperfusion were compared to low-potassium Euro-Collins (LPEC). For systematic reevaluation, five pig lungs, each, were preserved correspondingly for 27 h, and results were compared to sham-operated control lungs. In both models, edema formation was quantified stereologically. Statistics comprised different ANOVA models. Results. In both models, use of PERret resulted in significantly higher oxygenation capacity, lower inspiratory pressures, and lower amounts of intraalveolar edema as compared to PERant. Results of PERret were not different from sham controls in the in vivo model; furthermore, a continuous retrograde elimination of blood clots from pulmonary microcirculation was noticed. Conclusions. Retrograde application of LPD solution (Perfadex) results in significant functional and histological improvement as compared to antegrade perfusion. This innovative technique can be applied very easily in clinical practice and might be an ideal adjunct to further optimize the results after lung transplantation with LPD-based graft protection. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Issue Date
2004
Status
published
Publisher
Academic Press Inc Elsevier Science
Journal
Journal of Surgical Research 
ISSN
0022-4804

Reference

Citations


Social Media