AFLP fingerprinting of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) cultivars: identification, genetic relationship and comparison of AFLP informativeness parameters

2007 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​AFLP fingerprinting of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) cultivars: identification, genetic relationship and comparison of AFLP informativeness parameters​
Laurentin, H. & Karlovsky, P. ​ (2007) 
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution54(7) pp. 1437​-1446​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-006-9128-y 

License

Published Version

Special user license Goescholar License

Details

Authors
Laurentin, Hernan; Karlovsky, Petr 
Abstract
Amplified fragments length polymorphism (AFLP) was used to distinguish 20 cultivars of sesame (Sesamum indicum L.) and to elucidate the genetic relationship among these genotypes. The data were also used to estimate the usefulness of parameters currently used to assess the informativeness of molecular markers. A total of 339 markers were obtained using 8 primer combinations. Of the bands, 91% were polymorphic. Five primer combinations were able to distinguish all 20 cultivars used. None of the remaining three primer combinations could distinguish all accessions if used alone, but using all three combinations reduced the probability of a random match to 5 x 10(-5). Polymorphic information content (PIC), resolving power (Rp) and marker index (MI) of each primer combination failed to correlate significantly with the number of genotypes resolved. Jaccard's similarity coefficients ranged from 0.31 to 0.78. Fifteen cultivars were grouped by four UPGMA-clusters supported by bootstrapping values larger than 0.70. The grouping pattern was similar to the grouping generated by principal coordinate analysis. The results demonstrated that AFLP-based fingerprints can be used to identify unequivocally sesame genotypes, which is needed for cultivar identification and for the assessment of the genetic variability of breeding stocks. We recommend to use the number of cultivars identified by a primer combination instead of PIC, Rp and MI; and to calculate the maximal, instead of average probability of identical match by chance in the assessment of the informativeness of a marker for cultivar identification.
Issue Date
2007
Journal
Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 
Organization
Fakultät für Agrarwissenschaften ; Department für Nutzpflanzenwissenschaften ; Abteilung Molekulare Phytopathologie und Mykotoxinforschung 
ISSN
0925-9864

Reference

Citations


Social Media