Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex

2007 | journal article. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Timing-dependent modulation of associative plasticity by general network excitability in the human motor cortex​
Nitsche, M. A.; Roth, A.; Kuo, M.-F.; Fischer, A. K.; Liebetanz, D.; Lang, N. & Tergau, F. et al.​ (2007) 
Journal of Neuroscience27(14) pp. 3807​-3812​.​ DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5348-06.2007 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Nitsche, Michael A.; Roth, Amelie; Kuo, Min-Fang; Fischer, Anja K.; Liebetanz, David; Lang, Nicolas; Tergau, Frithjof; Paulus, Walter J.
Abstract
Associative neuroplasticity, which encompasses the modification of synaptic strength by coactivation of two synaptic inputs, has been linked to learning processes. Because unlimited plasticity destabilizes neuronal networks, homeostatic rules were proposed and experimentally proven that control for the amount and direction of plasticity dependent on background network activity. Accordingly, low background activity would enhance facilitatory plasticity, whereas high background activity would inhibit it. However, the impact of background excitability on associative plasticity has not been studied so far in humans. Facilitatory associative plasticity was induced by paired associative stimulation (PAS) in the human motor cortex, whereas background activity was enhanced or diminished by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). When applied before PAS, excitability-enhancing tDCS also boosted the efficacy of PAS, whereas excitability-diminishing tDCS turned it into inhibition. Thus, previous background activity does not influence associative plasticity homeostatically. When tDCS and PAS were applied simultaneously, now in accordance with homeostatic rules of neuroplasticity, reduced background activity resulted in a prolonged excitability enhancement by PAS, whereas enhanced background activity turned it into inhibition. We conclude that background network activity can influence associative plasticity homeostatically. However, only simultaneous modulation of both parameters is in accordance with homeostatic concepts. These findings might be of importance for the development of plasticity-inducing stimulation protocols supporting information processing in humans.
Issue Date
2007
Status
published
Publisher
Soc Neuroscience
Journal
Journal of Neuroscience 
ISSN
0270-6474

Reference

Citations


Social Media