Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials - Fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation

2007 | review. A publication with affiliation to the University of Göttingen.

Jump to: Cite & Linked | Documents & Media | Details | Version history

Cite this publication

​Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials - Fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation​
Wiegand, A. ; Buchalla, W.& Attin, T.​ (2007)
Dental Materials, 23​(3) pp. 343​-362​.​
Elsevier Sci Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022 

Documents & Media

License

GRO License GRO License

Details

Authors
Wiegand, Annette ; Buchalla, Wolfgang; Attin, Thomas
Abstract
Objectives. The purpose of this article was to review the fluoride release and recharge capabilities, and antibacterial properties, of fluoride-releasing dental restoratives, and discuss the current status concerning the prevention or inhibition of caries development and progression. Methods. Information from original scientific full papers or reviews listed in PubMed (search term: fluoride release AND (restorative OR glass-ionomer OR compomer OR polyacid-modified composite resin OR composite OR amalgam)), published from 1980 to 2004, was included in the review. Papers dealing with endodontic or orthodontic topics were not taken Clinical studies concerning secondary caries development were only into consideration. included when performed in split-mouth design with an observation period of at least three years. Results. Fluoride-containing dental materials show clear differences in the fluoride release and uptake characteristics. Short- and long-term fluoride releases from restoratives are related to their matrices, setting mechanisms and fluoride content and depend on several environmental conditions. Fluoride-releasing materials may act as a fluoride reservoir and may increase the fluoride level in saliva, plaque and dental hard tissues. However, clinical studies exhibited conflicting data as to whether or not these materials significantly prevent or inhibit secondary caries and affect the growth of caries-associated bacteria compared to non-fluoridated restoratives. Significance. Fluoride release and uptake characteristics depend on the matrices, fillers and fluoride content as well as on the setting mechanisms and environmental conditions of the restoratives. Fluoride-releasing materials, predominantly glass-ionomers and compomers, did show cariostatic properties and may affect bacterial metabolism under simulated cariogenic conditions in vitro. However, it is not proven by prospective clinical studies whether the incidence of secondary caries can be significantly reduced by the fluoride release of restorative materials. (c) 2006 Academy of Dental Materials. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Issue Date
2007
Status
published
Publisher
Elsevier Sci Ltd
Journal
Dental Materials 
ISSN
0109-5641

Reference

Citations


Social Media